Re: [Pacemaker] Exchanging data between resource agent instances

2013-03-21 Thread Riccardo Bicelli
Sorry for spamming :) Il 19/03/2013 10:43, Lars Ellenberg ha scritto: Is that so. What for? Can you explain in more detail? I'm writing a resource agent for handling SCST in master/slave with ALUA multipath support. On Master node it has to create a SCSI LUN mapped to a real device, and map

[Pacemaker] CMAN, corosync pacemaker

2013-03-21 Thread Ron Kerry
I believe I understand how to configure CMAN to work with corosync and pacemaker, but I do not really understand what roles these three packages all play. Perhaps this information is exposed in the written documentation that is available in various places, but I have not been able to discern it.

Re: [Pacemaker] CMAN, corosync pacemaker

2013-03-21 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 21.03.2013 um 13:32 schrieb Ron Kerry rke...@sgi.com: I believe I understand how to configure CMAN to work with corosync and pacemaker, but I do not really understand what roles these three packages all play. Perhaps this information is exposed in the written documentation that is

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker node stuck offline

2013-03-21 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 2013-03-21 14:31, Patrick Hemmer wrote: I've got a 2-node cluster where it seems last night one of the nodes went offline, and I can't see any reason why. Attached are the logs from the 2 nodes (the relevant timeframe seems to be 2013-03-21 between 06:05 and 06:10). This is on ubuntu

Re: [Pacemaker] CMAN, corosync pacemaker

2013-03-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 21.03.2013 um 13:32 schrieb Ron Kerry rke...@sgi.com: I believe I understand how to configure CMAN to work with corosync and pacemaker, but I do not really understand what roles these three packages all play.

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About sequential designation of resource_set.

2013-03-21 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, I registered this question with Bugzilla. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5147 Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Thu, 2013/3/14, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Andrew, In colocation, I used resource_set. However, a result

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About sequential designation of resource_set.

2013-03-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thursday, March 7, 2013, wrote: Hi Andrew, You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group. If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with sequential=true). In colocation, I used resource_set. However, a result did not include the change. Will this result be a

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About sequential designation of resource_set.

2013-03-21 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Thank your for comments. You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group. If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with sequential=true). In colocation, I used resource_set. However, a result did not include the change. Will this result be a mistake of

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About sequential designation of resource_set.

2013-03-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:34 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Andrew, Thank your for comments. You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group. If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with sequential=true). In colocation, I used resource_set. However, a

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About sequential designation of resource_set.

2013-03-21 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Thank your for comment. Sorry, I'm not sure I understand the question. Sorry When we use resource_set in substitution for ordered of a thing of group resource, do we use colocation set? Or do we use ordering set ? It does not seem to do work same as group ordered=fase if it

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker node stuck offline

2013-03-21 Thread pacemaker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/21/2013 11:15 AM, Andreas Kurz wrote: On 2013-03-21 14:31, Patrick Hemmer wrote: I've got a 2-node cluster where it seems last night one of the nodes went offline, and I can't see any reason why. Attached are the logs from the 2 nodes (the

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About sequential designation of resource_set.

2013-03-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:02 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Andrew, Thank your for comment. Sorry, I'm not sure I understand the question. Sorry When we use resource_set in substitution for ordered of a thing of group resource, do we use colocation set? Or do we use