Hi Andreas, thank you for your answer.
Maybe my description was a little fuzzy, sorry for that.
What I want is following:
* if l3_ping fails on a particular node, all services should go to standby on
that node (which probably works fine with on-fail="standby")
* if sip service (active/active)
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 2:28 PM
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Cc: shimaza...@intellilink.co.jp
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question about recovery policy after "Too many
> failures
Hi Andrew,
I confirmed that this problem was fixed.
Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 2:04 PM
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Cc: shimaza...@intellilink.co.jp
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Questio
Hi guys,
one question today about drbd resource on rhel6.x clone scientific linux 6.4
with pacemaker/cman
I configure drbd resource in pcs
pcs resource create drbd ocf:linbit:drbd drbd_resource="drbd0"
drbdconf=/usr/local/etc/drbd.conf op monitor interval="15" meta master-max="1"
master-node
On 17/04/2013, at 6:52 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I confirmed that this problem was fixed.
Excellent
> Thanks!
And thank you for bringing it to my attention :)
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 1
No one else using pacemaker and heartbeat on CentOS 6.4?
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks
Andreas
Am 09.04.2013 10:41, schrieb Andreas:
Am 09.04.2013 01:18, schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
On 08/04/2013, at 7:24 PM, Andreas wrote:
Just tried this to isolate the problem.
Trying this there was def
Hi All,
I'm trying to setup a specific configuration in our cluster, however I'm
struggling with my configuration.
This is what I'm trying to achieve:
On both nodes of the cluster a daemon must be running (tomcat).
Some failover addresses are configured and must be running on the node
with a
High-availability KVM over DRBD active/passive with Pacemaker and Corosync:
- Two hardware nodes with two NICs. One NIC directly connected to the other
node for DRBD mirroring, the second to the network, Operating system Debian
Wheezy RC1 (no joy with Debian Squeeze)
- A spare partition on each
Hi,
> b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
> and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
why not just installing the crmsh from a different repository?
This is what I have done on CentOS 6.4.
--
Chau y hasta luego,
Thorolf
___
On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
>> and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
> why not just installing the crmsh from a different repository?
>
> This is what I have done on CentOS 6.4.
My sentiments exactly. A
Hi,
> No one else using pacemaker and heartbeat on CentOS 6.4?
no, I switched to corosync/pacemaker, but it has not only advantages.
For me, the configuration is much more powerfull, but also more
complicated via the crm-shell.
--
Chau y hasta luego,
Thorolf
_
Hi all,
thank you for your hints.
Can you please point me to a repository where I can find
crmsh fitting to RHEL6.4 or clones?
Best regards
Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vadym Chepkov [mailto:vchep...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 18:13
An: The Pacemake
Hi Thorolf,
both solutions heartbeat + pacemaker and corosync + pacemaker
use pacemaker which can be configured using crm-shell.
So, I don't understand why the usage of crm-shell in your
case is more complicated? (besides the fact that you can only
make a two node cluster with heartbeat).
Best
Hi,
> So, I don't understand why the usage of crm-shell in your
> case is more complicated?
because in the "past", with the heartbeat (1) I was used, I only had to
put my resources into a file and sync it to the other node.
For me this was easier to understand and I hadn't the config issues I
hav
Hi,
> Can you please point me to a repository where I can find
> crmsh fitting to RHEL6.4 or clones?
haven't looked if there is a repo-file, I just installed via RPM:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/ha-clustering/CentOS_CentOS-6/x86_64/crmsh-1.2.5-55.3.x86_64.rpm
http://downlo
Hi Thorolf,
ah, ok. You meant hearbeat 1. Yes, this is really pre-pacemaker-time ;-)
Best regards
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: T. [mailto:nos...@godawa.de]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 21:41
An: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] CentOS 6.4 - pacemaker
Thank you for the links.
Best regards
Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: T. [mailto:nos...@godawa.de]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 21:44
An: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] pcs equivalent of crm configure erase
Hi,
> Can you please point me to a repos
On 18/04/2013, at 5:41 AM, T. wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> So, I don't understand why the usage of crm-shell in your
>> case is more complicated?
> because in the "past", with the heartbeat (1) I was used, I only had to
> put my resources into a file and sync it to the other node.
>
> For me this was eas
On 18/04/2013, at 2:13 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
>>> and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
>> why not just installing the crmsh from a different repository?
>>
>> T
On 04/17/13 11:13, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
Hi,
b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
why not just installing the crmsh from a different repository?
This is what I have done on CentOS 6
Hi All,
I sent the pull request of this patch.
* https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker-1.0/pull/13
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Wed, 2013/4/10, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We confirmed the phenomenon that an error generated to be behind with a stop
> of ping
Hi Dejan,
Hi Andreas,
> The shell in pacemaker v1.0.x is in maintenance mode and shipped
> along with the pacemaker code. The v1.1.x doesn't have the
> ordered and collocated meta attributes.
I sent the pull request of the patch which Mr. Dejan donated.
* https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker
On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Chris Feist wrote:
> On 04/17/13 11:13, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
>>> why not just installin
Hi,
2013/4/15 Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 15/04/2013, at 3:38 PM, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2013/4/8 Andrew Beekhof :
>>> I'm not 100% sure what the best approach is here.
>>>
>>> Traditionally this is done with resource agents (ie. ClusterMon or ping)
>>> which update attrd.
>>> We could p
24 matches
Mail list logo
