[Pacemaker] [Question and Problem] In vSphere5.1 environment, IO blocking of pengine occurs at the time of shared disk trouble for a long time.

2013-05-13 Thread renayama19661014
Hi All, We constituted a simple cluster in environment of vSphere5.1. We composed it of two ESXi servers and shared disk. The guest located it to the shared disk. Step 1) Constitute a cluster.(A DC node is an active node.) Last updated: Mon May 13 14:16:09 2013 Stack: Heartbeat

Re: [Pacemaker] SmartOS / illumos

2013-05-13 Thread Andrei Belov
Hello, On May 10, 2013, at 4:02 , Dalho PARK dp...@smart-trade.net wrote: Hello, I’m trying to compile pacemaker on SmartOS and having error during make. Does anyone has already successfully compiled on SmartOS? Sorta. I spent some time making pkgsrc ports for libqb (0.14.4), corosync

[Pacemaker] help with DRBD/pacemaker

2013-05-13 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Hi, I experienced a strange phenomena when setting up DRBD 8.4.2 with pacemaker 1.1.9. I can set up a dual primary DRBD manually without any problems. Now shut down one node, i.e. I demote the DRBD and the shut is down. When I start the cluster on the first node everything if fine. The CRM

[Pacemaker] crm subshell 1.2.4 incompatible to pacemaker 1.1.9?

2013-05-13 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Hi, crm tells me it is version 1.2.4 pacemaker tell me it is verison 1.1.9 So it should work since incompatibilities are resolved in crm higher that version 1.2.1. Anywas crm tells me nonsense: # crm crm(live)# node crm(live)node# standby node1 ERROR: bad lifetime: node1 Any ideas? -- Dr.

[Pacemaker] pcs group colocation and ping rules

2013-05-13 Thread Diego Remolina
Hi, I was wondering if anybody can tell me what is the best way to replicate the following crm commands in pcs. It seems pcs cannot do any collocation rules using groups (or I just do not know how to properly do it). I was also not able to figure out how to colocate a drbd resource on the

Re: [Pacemaker] pcs group colocation and ping rules

2013-05-13 Thread Diego Remolina
On 05/13/2013 10:03 AM, Diego Remolina wrote: Hi, I was wondering if anybody can tell me what is the best way to replicate the following crm commands in pcs. It seems pcs cannot do any collocation rules using groups (or I just do not know how to properly do it). I was also not able to figure

Re: [Pacemaker] ClusterMon Resource starting multiple instances of crm_mon

2013-05-13 Thread Florian Crouzat
Le 09/05/2013 16:40, Steven Bambling a écrit : I'm having some issues with getting some cluster monitoring setup and configured on a 3 node multi-state cluster. I'm using Florian's blog as an example

[Pacemaker] Migrating VMs that depend on other VMs

2013-05-13 Thread Lindsay Todd
Folks: On my cluster built on SL6.4, I need to deploy some VMs that depend on other VMs: - db0 has no dependendencies - ldap01,ldap02 require db0 to be running -- ordering constraint, but no collocation (other than we'll use a collocation constraint to recommend ldap01, ldap02 run on

Re: [Pacemaker] crm subshell 1.2.4 incompatible to pacemaker 1.1.9?

2013-05-13 Thread Rainer Brestan
Seems that it requires now the lifetime crm node standby node1 forever The error message is just nonsense. Rainer Gesendet:Montag, 13. Mai 2013 um 13:53 Uhr Von:Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com An:pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Betreff:[Pacemaker] crm subshell 1.2.4 incompatible

Re: [Pacemaker] Migrating VMs that depend on other VMs

2013-05-13 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
13.05.2013 19:28, Lindsay Todd wrote: Folks: On my cluster built on SL6.4, I need to deploy some VMs that depend on other VMs: * db0 has no dependendencies * ldap01,ldap02 require db0 to be running -- ordering constraint, but no collocation (other than we'll use a collocation

Re: [Pacemaker] Migrating VMs that depend on other VMs

2013-05-13 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - From: Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 2:19:07 PM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Migrating VMs that depend on other VMs 13.05.2013 19:28, Lindsay Todd wrote: Folks: On my cluster built on SL6.4,

Re: [Pacemaker] Using fence_sanlock with pacemaker 1.1.8-7.el6

2013-05-13 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-05-10T02:18:36, John McCabe j...@johnmccabe.net wrote: I ended up getting sbd up and running as an interim solution - but I'd really like to be able to stick with a fencing agent thats got a future in RHEL where possible. Is the expectation/intention that all fencing agents be

Re: [Pacemaker] Migrating VMs that depend on other VMs

2013-05-13 Thread Lindsay Todd
The whitebox container implementation, is that the ability to manage resources inside the VMs from the same ha-cluster that is managing the VM instances, i.e., the pacemaker-remote agent? I've not tried that; so far I've stuck to the stock SL6.4 RPMs... But that could help help some --

Re: [Pacemaker] help with DRBD/pacemaker

2013-05-13 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 2013-05-13 11:54, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: Hi, I experienced a strange phenomena when setting up DRBD 8.4.2 with pacemaker 1.1.9. I can set up a dual primary DRBD manually without any problems. Now shut down one node, i.e. I demote the DRBD and the shut is down.