Re: [Pacemaker] crmsh dosn't respect the acl read permissions

2013-07-09 Thread emmanuel segura
Hello Andrew please, can you tell me why? Thanks 2013/7/9 Andrew Beekhof > > On 09/07/2013, at 3:29 PM, emmanuel segura wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I compiled pacemaker using the following commands > > > > git clone git://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker.git > > cd pacemaker > > make rpm-dep > >

Re: [Pacemaker] crmsh dosn't respect the acl read permissions

2013-07-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 09/07/2013, at 4:58 PM, emmanuel segura wrote: > Hello Andrew > > please, can you tell me why? Because its easy to turn on for anyone that wants it > > Thanks > > > 2013/7/9 Andrew Beekhof > > On 09/07/2013, at 3:29 PM, emmanuel segura wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I compiled pacemaker us

Re: [Pacemaker] crmsh dosn't respect the acl read permissions

2013-07-09 Thread emmanuel segura
Thanks Andrew I know is easy, but for enable this option the pacemaker needs to be compiled with --with-acl, if i understand well Thanks 2013/7/9 Andrew Beekhof > > On 09/07/2013, at 4:58 PM, emmanuel segura wrote: > > > Hello Andrew > > > > please, can you tell me why? > > Because its easy

Re: [Pacemaker] crmsh dosn't respect the acl read permissions

2013-07-09 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-07-09T09:14:30, emmanuel segura wrote: > I know is easy, but for enable this option the pacemaker needs to be > compiled with --with-acl, if i understand well Yes. If you want that feature, make sure your distributor builds packages with that enabled. After that, it becomes a runtime opt

Re: [Pacemaker] Java application failover problem

2013-07-09 Thread Martin Gazak
Dňa 7/9/2013 12:56 PM Andrew Beekhof wrote / napísal(a): > > On 09/07/2013, at 8:49 PM, Martin Gazak wrote: > >> Dňa 7/9/2013 12:42 PM Andrew Beekhof wrote / napísal(a): >>> >>> On 09/07/2013, at 5:05 PM, Martin Gazak >>> wrote: > > It looks to be a bug in 1.1.7, you'll want to contact SUSE

Re: [Pacemaker] Java application failover problem

2013-07-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 09/07/2013, at 10:29 PM, Martin Gazak wrote: > Dňa 7/9/2013 12:56 PM Andrew Beekhof wrote / napísal(a): >> >> On 09/07/2013, at 8:49 PM, Martin Gazak >> wrote: >> >>> Dňa 7/9/2013 12:42 PM Andrew Beekhof wrote / napísal(a): On 09/07/2013, at 5:05 PM, Martin Gazak wrote