Fixed:
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/0c996a1
On 01/08/2013, at 2:00 AM, David Vossel wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Kazunori INOUE"
>> To: "pacemaker@oss"
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:20:58 AM
>> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior when a
On 01/08/2013, at 1:56 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> This patch works fine.
Excellent. Thankyou for confirming!
Pushed:
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/5896233
>
> 2013/8/1 Andrew Beekhof :
>>
>> On 01/08/2013, at 10:18 AM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>
>>>
Hi David,
I opened Bugzilla about this.
* http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5173
Best Regards.
(13.08.01 01:00), David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Kazunori INOUE"
To: "pacemaker@oss"
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:20:58 AM
Subject: [Pacemaker] Question abou
Hi Andrew
This patch works fine.
2013/8/1 Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 01/08/2013, at 10:18 AM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> I'm about to collect logs of crm_report,
>> but Rainer already provides it.
>>
>> Could you see his reports ?
>
> I had just written:
>
> "I can but they're ins
On 01/08/2013, at 10:18 AM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> I'm about to collect logs of crm_report,
> but Rainer already provides it.
>
> Could you see his reports ?
I had just written:
"I can but they're insufficiently helpful."
when a thought struck me
Can you try the follow
Hi Andrew
I'm about to collect logs of crm_report,
but Rainer already provides it.
Could you see his reports ?
Thanks,
Takatoshi MATSUO
2013/8/1 Rainer Brestan :
> Base situation for the logs:
> Pacemaker stop on int2node1 and int2node2
> Master/slave resource msABC already configured.
> Inclu
On 07/31/2013 01:23 PM, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Matthew O'Connor"
>> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:08:11 PM
>> Subject: [Pacemaker] resource status question
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> pacemaker 1.1.10...
>>
>> I
Base situation for the logs:
Pacemaker stop on int2node1 and int2node2
Master/slave resource msABC already configured.
Included in the crm_report is also per node a file "a", this is the one, which the modified Stateful RA writes to log each action performed.
1.) 19:22:25 start Pacemaker on
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew O'Connor"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:08:11 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] resource status question
>
> Hi!
>
> pacemaker 1.1.10...
>
> I have an AoEtarget resource that uses a DRBD device as it
Hi!
pacemaker 1.1.10...
I have an AoEtarget resource that uses a DRBD device as its backing
store. I was testing fail-over via fencing when I discovered the
following: When the failed node is brought back online, the AoEtarget
resource fails its monitor, reporting "not installed." From what I c
- Original Message -
> From: "Kazunori INOUE"
> To: "pacemaker@oss"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:20:58 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior when a resource was put into
> unmanaged mode
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. (4ae1f17)
> When I put a primitive (p
On 7/31/13 16:17 , Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kirill Proskurin wrote:
On 7/31/13 03:51 , Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31/07/2013, at 1:44 AM, Kirill Proskurin wrote:
Quick follow-up
I add --enable-fatal-warnings=no
And now make start to work.
I see a lot of
../../incl
On 31/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kirill Proskurin wrote:
> On 7/31/13 03:51 , Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 31/07/2013, at 1:44 AM, Kirill Proskurin wrote:
>>
>>> Quick follow-up
>>>
>>> I add --enable-fatal-warnings=no
>>> And now make start to work.
>>>
>>> I see a lot of
>>> ../../include/por
On 31/07/2013, at 5:17 PM, Rainer Brestan wrote:
> Modified the RA to log each action call performed and from this log there is
> no call of monitor action.
>
> From the logs i do not think it is the policy engine, it might be the LRM
> part of crmd (the is the only relevant change be seen a
On 31/07/2013, at 6:57 PM, Johan Huysmans wrote:
>
> On 31-07-13 03:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 30/07/2013, at 12:29 AM, Johan Huysmans wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was testing the latest rc7 and the final version of 1.1.10.
>>>
>>> My test is the combination of cloned resources and 1 re
On 31-07-13 03:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 30/07/2013, at 12:29 AM, Johan Huysmans wrote:
Hi,
I was testing the latest rc7 and the final version of 1.1.10.
My test is the combination of cloned resources and 1 resource group containing
constraints that the resource group can only run on a
On 7/31/13 03:51 , Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31/07/2013, at 1:44 AM, Kirill Proskurin wrote:
Quick follow-up
I add --enable-fatal-warnings=no
And now make start to work.
I see a lot of
../../include/portability.h:165: warning: implicit declaration of function
'strcmp'
warnings, but all wer
Modified the RA to log each action call performed and from this log there is no call of monitor action.
From the logs i do not think it is the policy engine, it might be the LRM part of crmd (the is the only relevant change be seen after git diff between 1.1.10-rc7 and 1.1.10).
Explanatio
18 matches
Mail list logo
