26.08.2013, 03:34, "Andrew Beekhof" :
> On 23/08/2013, at 9:39 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Today I try remake my test cluster from cman to corosync2.
>> I drew attention to the following:
>> If I reset cluster with cman through cibadmin --erase --force
>> In cib is still the
On 23/08/2013, at 7:18 PM, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For a long time I used heartbeat/drbd for 2 nodes clusters with Fedora, I
> used the internal crm of heartbeat not pacemaker.
>
> I planned to upgrade from the fc17 to the fc18, but on fc18 heartbeat is
> obsolete and I have to ch
On 23/08/2013, at 9:39 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I try remake my test cluster from cman to corosync2.
> I drew attention to the following:
> If I reset cluster with cman through cibadmin --erase --force
> In cib is still there exist names of nodes.
Yes, the cluster puts back
On 24/08/2013, at 5:26 AM, Nate Clark wrote:
> I have a few systems running pacemaker 1.1.7 using corosync and some of them
> hit the issue that the nodeid in the cib is recorded as a negative number.
> This issue was resolved in commit f0e9b262f1d3219df248a5340771f8e23c5d6bce.
> However if y
