On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:04:01 +1100 Andrew Beekhof
wrote:
> If you find yourself asking $subject at some point in the next couple
> of months, the answer is that I'm taking leave to look after our new
> son (Lawson Tiberius Beekhof) who was born on Tuesday.
Concrats!
And remember: If you want HA,
>> And remember: If you want HA, you gotta have two :-P
Just leave STONITH out of this particular cluster.
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterl
Nope, you need three to always have a quorum.
On Dec 1, 2013 9:43 AM, "Arnold Krille" wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:04:01 +1100 Andrew Beekhof
> wrote:
> > If you find yourself asking $subject at some point in the next couple
> > of months, the answer is that I'm taking leave to look after our
On 01/12/13 16:36, Nick Cameo wrote:
>>> And remember: If you want HA, you gotta have two :-P
>
> Just leave STONITH out of this particular cluster.
The one and only time I will ever agree that stonith is not a good idea. ;)
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure
Thanks to everyone for the well wishes, and yes this is our third so we
can get quorum now ;-)
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013, at 01:51 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
Nope, you need three to always have a quorum.
On Dec 1, 2013 9:43 AM, "Arnold Krille" <[1]arn...@arnoldarts.de>
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 201
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013, at 06:20 PM, T.J. Yang wrote:
Hi
Any pointer for the following compilation errors ?
[tjyang@pm1 services]$ make
CC libcrmservice_la-upstart.lo
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
upstart.c: In function ‘upstart_job_property’:
upstart.c:264: error: implicit dec
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013, at 04:50 AM, Olivier Nicaise wrote:
Hello all,
I have an issue with the no quorum policy freeze (stonith disabled).
I'm using an old version of pacemaker (1.1.6), the one distributed by
Ubuntu 12.04.
I have a cluster with 3 nodes running various resources, including
drbd
J
Congratulations!
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: 01 December 2013 23:44
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Where the heck is Beekhof?
Thanks to everyone for the well wishes, and yes this is our third so we can
get quorum now ;-)
Hi Andrew,
Please discard this RHEL 6.5 report , I am shifting my pacemaker rpm
compilation effort to Fedora 17/18.
tj
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013, at 06:20 PM, T.J. Yang wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Any pointer for the following compilation errors
