Hi,
as far as I unterstood RH is going to do all infrastructure in the cman layer
and user pacemaker only for resource management. Whith this setup fencing also
will be a job of the fenced of the cman package.
This design has its advantages: If descisions are taked on a low level, all
parts
Hi,
as far as I unterstood RH is going to do all infrastructure in the cman layer
and user pacemaker only for resource management. Whith this setup fencing also
will be a job of the fenced of the cman package.
This design has its advantages: If descisions are taked on a low level, all
parts of
No. I use it now. But setting up fencing in two places
- cman - links to pacemaker
- pamcemaker
it not very nice to configure fencing in two places.
Is there any way that pacemaker can tell cman about it's fencing descisions?
It takes place because cman doing fencing through fenced. It is also
Now you're out numbered! ;-)
That's a handful - enjoy the time with the family!
Jake
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: 01 December 2013 23:44
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org mailto:pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Where the heck is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A very wonderful congratulations to you!! Enjoy every minute! They
grow so very fast...
- -- Matthew O'Connor
On 11/27/2013 08:04 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
If you find yourself asking $subject at some point in the next couple of
months, the
So, I'm migrating my working pacemaker configuration from 1.1.7 to
1.1.10 and am finding what appears to be a new behavior in 1.1.10.
If a given node is running a fencing resource and that node goes AWOL,
it needs to be fenced (of course). But any other node trying to take
over the fencing
On 11/20/2013 03:30 PM, Martin Ševčík wrote:
Hello,
I have troubles setting up 'best connectivity' rule using pcs on RHEL 6.4. I
have two nodes setup with ping resource defined as:
pcs resource create ping ocf:pacemaker:ping host_list=10.242.40.251
10.242.40.252 multiplier=1000
and location
