[Pacemaker] host came online but it was ignored

2013-12-10 Thread ESWAR RAO
Hi All, I had a 3 node HB+pacemaker setup. When I restarted the nodes, all the nodes have HB restarted but they are not joining ONLINE group in crm status. #vim /etc/ha.d/ha.cf .. node nvsd-1 nvsd-2 nvp-common crm respawn Dec 10 14:13:48 nvp-common

Re: [Pacemaker] host came online but it was ignored

2013-12-10 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013, 14:30:32 schrieb ESWAR RAO: Hi All, I had a 3 node HB+pacemaker setup. When I restarted the nodes, all the nodes have HB restarted but they are not joining ONLINE group in crm status. #vim /etc/ha.d/ha.cf .. node nvsd-1 nvsd-2

Re: [Pacemaker] is ccs as racy as it feels?

2013-12-10 Thread Christine Caulfield
On 09/12/13 23:01, Brian J. Murrell wrote: So, I'm trying to wrap my head around this need to migrate to pacemaker +CMAN. I've been looking at http://clusterlabs.org/quickstart-redhat.html and

Re: [Pacemaker] host came online but it was ignored

2013-12-10 Thread ESWAR RAO
Hi Micheal, There are no firewall rules. I could only see below messages in logs: Dec 10 14:13:48 nvp-common crmd: [9220]: WARN: crmd_ha_msg_callback: Ignoring HA message (op=join_announce) from nvsd-1: not in our membership list (size=1) On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Michael

Re: [Pacemaker] is ccs as racy as it feels?

2013-12-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 10:27 +, Christine Caulfield wrote: Sadly you're not wrong. That's what I was afraid of. But it's actually no worse than updating corosync.conf manually, I think it is... in fact it's pretty much the same thing, Not really. Updating corosync.conf on any

Re: [Pacemaker] is ccs as racy as it feels?

2013-12-10 Thread Christine Caulfield
On 10/12/13 12:31, Brian J. Murrell wrote: On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 10:27 +, Christine Caulfield wrote: Sadly you're not wrong. That's what I was afraid of. But it's actually no worse than updating corosync.conf manually, I think it is... in fact it's pretty much the same thing, Not

Re: [Pacemaker] host came online but it was ignored

2013-12-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
version of pacemaker? On 10 Dec 2013, at 10:41 pm, ESWAR RAO eswar7...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Micheal, There are no firewall rules. I could only see below messages in logs: Dec 10 14:13:48 nvp-common crmd: [9220]: WARN: crmd_ha_msg_callback: Ignoring HA message (op=join_announce) from

Re: [Pacemaker] is ccs as racy as it feels?

2013-12-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10 Dec 2013, at 11:31 pm, Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca wrote: On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 10:27 +, Christine Caulfield wrote: Sadly you're not wrong. That's what I was afraid of. But it's actually no worse than updating corosync.conf manually, I think it is... in

Re: [Pacemaker] host came online but it was ignored

2013-12-10 Thread ESWAR RAO
Hi Andrew, # pacemakerd --version Pacemaker 1.1.7 Written by Andrew Beekhof # ps -aef|grep heart root 8926 1 0 20:02 ?00:00:00 heartbeat: master control process root 8930 8926 0 20:02 ?00:00:00 heartbeat: FIFO reader root 8931 8926 0 20:02 ?

Re: [Pacemaker] Reg. trigger when node failure occurs

2013-12-10 Thread ESWAR RAO
Hi Micheal, I am configuring the ClusterMon as below on the 3 node setup: I am following http://floriancrouzat.net/2013/01/monitor-a-pacemaker-cluster-with-ocfpacemakerclustermon-andor-external-agent/ # crm configure primitive ClusterMon ocf:pacemaker:ClusterMon params user=root update=10

[Pacemaker] Reg. violate uniqueness for parameter

2013-12-10 Thread ESWAR RAO
Hi All, When I ran below configuration on a 3 node HB+pacemaker setup I am getting WARNING: Resources cluster-ip,nvp_vip violate uniqueness for parameter ip: 192.168.101.205 Do you still want to commit? y ++ # crm configure primitive