On 03/01/14 12:07 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/01/14 11:56 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.01.2014 07:46, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
Cluster from Scratch tutor
On 02/01/14 11:56 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.01.2014 07:46, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
Cluster from Scratch tutorial and got to the point where I was r
03.01.2014 07:46, Digimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
> hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
> Cluster from Scratch tutorial and got to the point where I was running
> Active/Active.
>
> Here I have
Hi all,
While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
Cluster from Scratch tutorial and got to the point where I was running
Active/Active.
Here I have a couple of problems.
First up, the dlm
$cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.4 (Final)
$rpm -qa | grep -i pcs
pcs-0.9.26-10.el6_4.1.noarch
So look like I might have an older version of pcs ..
--
!
( o o )
--oOO(_)OOo--
Luc Paulin
email: pau
On 01/02/2014 01:54 PM, Luc Paulin wrote:
Thanx for the syntax, however it does not seem to work.
When I try it, it immediately return the help syntax menu, as if the command not
suported.
[root@fwcorp-01 (NEW FW HOST) ~]$pcs constraint colocation set vip_v253_178
vip_v253_179 vip_v253
Which v
- Original Message -
> From: "Digimer"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 2:03:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Forming single node cluster?
>
> On 02/01/14 02:36 PM, John Wei wrote:
> > Any way to form a single node cluster? I am evaluat
On 02/01/14 02:36 PM, John Wei wrote:
Any way to form a single node cluster? I am evaluating pacemaker. Hope I
can do this with just single server.
John
I'm not sure how much you can evaluate with just one node, but
technically, I see no reason why you couldn't. You would have to disable
bot
Thanx for the syntax, however it does not seem to work.
When I try it, it immediately return the help syntax menu, as if the
command not suported.
[root@fwcorp-01 (NEW FW HOST) ~]$pcs constraint colocation set vip_v253_178
vip_v253_179 vip_v253
Usage: pcs constraint [constraints]...
Manage resour
02.01.2014 12:53, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:41:20 +0300
> Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> I would expect that only one option is modified, but crmsh intend to
>> remove all others.
>>
>> May be it is possible to fix it by one-line crmsh patch?
>>
>> Kristoffer, Dejan?
>>
Any way to form a single node cluster? I am evaluating pacemaker. Hope I
can do this with just single server.
John
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.c
On 01/02/2014 10:37 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2014-01-02T11:22:01, Luc Paulin wrote:
That make sense to use the colocation. So I guess that I should define a
"master" resource and tell each other resource that they should colocated
on the same node at the "master" resource.
You could
- Original Message -
> From: "Digimer"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2014 5:38:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker 1.1.10 + RHEL 7 beta issues
>
> >
> > Is this a bug?
There's too much going on here for me to tell. Can you provide a
- Original Message -
> From: "Digimer"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 6:57:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Problem with stonith in rhel7 + pacemaker 1.1.10 +
> fence_virsh
>
> On 23/12/13 04:31 PM, Digimer wrote:
> > On 23/12/13 0
On 2014-01-02T11:22:01, Luc Paulin wrote:
> That make sense to use the colocation. So I guess that I should define a
> "master" resource and tell each other resource that they should colocated
> on the same node at the "master" resource.
You could also use a resource set to achieve this, but I d
Thanx for quick reply,
That make sense to use the colocation. So I guess that I should define a
"master" resource and tell each other resource that they should colocated
on the same node at the "master" resource.
pcs constraint colocation add resourceA master_resource INFINITY
pcs constraint coloc
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 09:49:40 -0500
Luc Paulin wrote:
> I am trying figure out in which case I should be using a constraint
> colocation or the resource group. At the end it look that both will
> result in the same result, the resource will be running on the same
> host.
>
> As an example I am cur
Hi Everyone,
First I want to wish everyone an happy new year.
I am trying figure out in which case I should be using a constraint
colocation or the resource group. At the end it look that both will result
in the same result, the resource will be running on the same host.
As an example I am curren
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:41:20 +0300
Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> I would expect that only one option is modified, but crmsh intend to
> remove all others.
>
> May be it is possible to fix it by one-line crmsh patch?
>
> Kristoffer, Dejan?
>
> Best,
> Vladislav
>
>
Hi,
This was indeed a bug i
19 matches
Mail list logo
