On 13 Feb 2014, at 9:56 am, Andrew Daugherity adaugher...@tamu.edu wrote:
I noticed in recent discussions on this list that this RA is apparently a
SUSE thing and not upstreamed into resource-agents. This was news to me, but
apparently is indeed the case.
I guess it's SUSE's decision
On 17 Jan 2014, at 4:33 pm, Michael Monette mmone...@2keys.ca wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 servers setup with Postgres and /dev/drbd1 is mounted at
/var/lib/pgsql. I also have pacemaker setup and it's setup to fail back and
forth between the 2 nodes. It works really well for the most part.
I
On 20 Jan 2014, at 8:05 pm, Axel a...@xlrs.de wrote:
Hi all,
this is my first post, i hope i meet all required informations and netiquette
on this list.
I need help to backup and restore resource configuration i made with corosync
/ pacemaker an an ubuntu server (precise)
I
Was there a question here somewhere?
On 20 Jan 2014, at 9:59 pm, Praveen praveenshin...@gmail.com wrote:
[root@pcmk-2 ~]# pcs status
Cluster name: mycluster
Last updated: Mon Jan 20 15:56:13 2014
Last change: Mon Jan 20 15:47:11 2014 via crm_attribute on pcmk-1
Stack: corosync
Current DC:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 10:50 pm, Néstor C. xala...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
When you need that some primitives switch in block you can use a group.
Groups are just a syntactic shortcut for ordering and colocation constraints.
There is a manner to get this when you have a clone or a
On 22 Jan 2014, at 12:18 am, Robert Lindgren robert.lindg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get rid of some stonith info logging but I fail :(
Turn off debug and, for everything else, edit the C source code
The log-lines are like this in syslog:
Jan 21 13:24:15 wolf1 stonith-ng:
On 25 Jan 2014, at 12:55 am, Parveen Jain parveenj...@live.com wrote:
Hi All,
Can there be any problem if we install pacemaker/corosync on different
subnets(for a simple two machine setup cluster) ?
Corosync uses multicast by default which I could easily imagine would not like
this kind
On 7 Feb 2014, at 10:22 pm, Asgaroth li...@blueface.com wrote:
On 06/02/2014 05:52, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi,
I bet your problem comes from the LSB clvmd init script.
Here is what it does do:
===
...
clustered_vgs() {
${lvm_vgdisplay} 2/dev/null | \
awk
On 11 Feb 2014, at 2:49 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi,
cannot find anywhere (am I blind?), is it possible to manually inject
'reload' op for a given resource?
Background for this is if some configuration files are edited, and
resource-agent (or LSB script)
On 11 Feb 2014, at 8:23 pm, Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)
stefan.ba...@iz.bwl.de wrote:
Hi List,
we’ve recovered a cluster after a failure and used a previously exported
cib.xml. Everything is back to normal state.
The strange thing is, that the order in the output of crm_mon is not like
Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted
consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()?
On 22 Jan 2014, at 3:05 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi All,
My test seemed to include a mistake.
It seems to be replaced by two limitation.
On 31 Jan 2014, at 3:18 am, Pascal BERTON pascal.bert...@free.fr wrote:
Hi !
I recently changed hosting platform versions for my PCMK clusters, from
RHEL6.0 equivalent towards SL6.4. Also changed from pcmk 1.1.2+corosync 1.3.3
to pcmk 1.1.10+corosync 1.4.1 that come with SL6.
Until
On 7 Feb 2014, at 8:54 pm, Frank Brendel frank.bren...@eurolog.com wrote:
Its somewhat inferred in the description of cluster-recheck-interval
cluster-recheck-interval = time [15min]
Polling interval for time based changes to options, resource
parameters and
Attachments beat pastebin as they don't expire :)
What does your config look like after you run:
crm resource migrate nfs_services nfs01
?
On 7 Feb 2014, at 5:00 am, Andrew J. Caines a.j.cai...@halplant.com wrote:
I'm new to Pacemaker and am working on my RTFM+STFW efforts, but have an
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted
consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()?
Yes.
I think that a default is not handled well.
I will not have any problem when sequential attribute is set in cib by
Hi Andrew,
I found your correction.
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/37ff51a0edba208e6240e812936717fffc941a41
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Wed, 2014/2/12, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
wrote:
Hi All,
There is difference in two between handling of
On 17 Feb 2014, at 12:47 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted
consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()?
Yes.
I think that a default is not handled
Hi Andrew,
Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted
consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()?
Yes.
I think that a default is not handled well.
I will not have any problem when sequential attribute is set in cib by
all means.
On 12 Feb 2014, at 1:39 am, Ajay Aggarwal aaggar...@verizon.com wrote:
Yes, we have cman (version: cman-3.0.12.1-49). We use manual fencing ( I know
it is not recommended). There is an external monitoring and fencing service
that we use (our own).
Perhaps subject line resource is too
On 16 Feb 2014, at 6:53 am, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com wrote:
i think, if you use pacemaker_remote inside the container, the container will
be a normal node of you cluster, so you can run pgsql + vip in it
2014-02-15 19:40 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Kontusz tomasz.kont...@gmail.com:
Hi
17.02.2014, 02:27, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
With no quick follow-up, dare one hope that means the patch worked? :-)
Hi,
No, unfortunately the chief changed my plans on Friday and all day I was
engaged in a parallel project.
I hope that today have time to carry out the necessary
Hi All,
The crm_mon tool which is attached to Pacemaker1.1 seems to have a problem.
I send a patch.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
trac2781.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
14.02.2014 17:23, Beo Banks ?:
hi stefan,
it seems that's more stable but after 2 minute the issue is back again.
hopefully isn't a bug because it can reproduce it
node2 sents only unicast at sequenz 256...
node1
omping 10.0.0.22 10.0.0.21
10.0.0.22 :unicast, seq=257, size=69 bytes,
Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net napisał:
On 16 Feb 2014, at 6:53 am, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com wrote:
i think, if you use pacemaker_remote inside the container, the
container will be a normal node of you cluster, so you can run pgsql +
vip in it
2014-02-15 19:40 GMT+01:00
example: colocation ipwithpgsql inf: virtualip psql:Master
2014-02-17 6:25 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Kontusz tomasz.kont...@gmail.com:
Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net napisał:
On 16 Feb 2014, at 6:53 am, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com wrote:
i think, if you use pacemaker_remote inside
Hi All,
The next change was accomplished by Mr. Lars.
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/6a17c003b0167de9fe51d5330fb6e4f1b4ffe64c
I may lack the correction of other parts which are not the patch which I sent.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Mon, 2014/2/17,
26 matches
Mail list logo
