Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL/centos6 - cman+pacemaker cluster with lots of resources - crash

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 23 Apr 2014, at 3:59 pm, Nikola Ciprich wrote: >> >> ok. >> >> was there a reason you created two threads about the same issue? > > actually I started first one just to ask how to check values are properly > set, I came to crash problem later, so I started another one.. sorry about > the

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL/centos6 - cman+pacemaker cluster with lots of resources - crash

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 22 Apr 2014, at 2:54 am, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > PCMK_ipc_buffer=13828900 > PCMK_ipc_type=shared-mem > PCMK_STACK=cman > > I've also exported all those variables using .bash_profile so they're > available > to CLI tools. Did you also see the first line of the sysconfig file that says: # F

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL/centos6 - cman+pacemaker cluster with lots of resources - crash

2014-04-22 Thread Nikola Ciprich
> > ok. > > was there a reason you created two threads about the same issue? actually I started first one just to ask how to check values are properly set, I came to crash problem later, so I started another one.. sorry about the mess, I think first one can be abandoned... > ___

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL/centos6 - pacemaker - checking value of PCMK_ipc_buffer

2014-04-22 Thread Nikola Ciprich
> So just to be clear, pacemaker was restarted _after_ you set you updated > /etc/sysconfig/pacemaker ? yes, I tried restarting both cman and pacemaker (actually even whole test VM to be sure there are no leftovers..) n. > > > > > nik > > > >> > >>> best regards > >>> > >>> nik > >>> > >

Re: [Pacemaker] help building 2 node config

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Try adding: to the block. That should ensure the behaviour you're looking for. On 19 Mar 2014, at 11:00 am, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net] >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 March 2014 10:24 A

Re: [Pacemaker] N+1 and equal priority resource groups

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 23 Apr 2014, at 1:46 am, Igal Baevsky wrote: > Andrew Beekhof writes: > >> Correct. >> Given colocate(A, B, -inf), in order to find out where A can go, we need > to know where B is (going to go). >> Even if we made it so that was no longer the case (which at a stretch > might even be pos

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL/centos6 - pacemaker - checking value of PCMK_ipc_buffer

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 22 Apr 2014, at 8:25 pm, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > Hello David, > >> what version of libqb and pacemaker are you using? > pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.2.x86_64 > libqb-0.16.0-2.el6.x86_64 So just to be clear, pacemaker was restarted _after_ you set you updated /etc/sysconfig/pacemaker ? > > n

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL/centos6 - cman+pacemaker cluster with lots of resources - crash

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 22 Apr 2014, at 3:23 pm, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > Hi Andrew, > >> The tools don't (and shouldn't) read /etc/sysconfig/pacemaker >> You'll need to set those values in your normal shell environment for now >> (7.1 should make everything work as expected) > yes, I've mentioned it in my previous

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL/centos6 - pacemaker - checking value of PCMK_ipc_buffer

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 18 Apr 2014, at 8:34 pm, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 18.04.2014 um 07:47 schrieb Nikola Ciprich : >> Hello, >> >> I've hit internal limit of PCMK_ipc_buffer on one of my cluster. >> Unfortunately I'm using corosync + plugin configuration (which I >> know is discouraged, so I'll switch this prod

Re: [Pacemaker] N+1 and equal priority resource groups

2014-04-22 Thread Igal Baevsky
Andrew Beekhof writes: > Correct. > Given colocate(A, B, -inf), in order to find out where A can go, we need to know where B is (going to go). > Even if we made it so that was no longer the case (which at a stretch might even be possible after all these > years), there is still an implicit ord

Re: [Pacemaker] Best practice for quorum nodes

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Martin
- Original Message - > From: "David Vossel" > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:39:22 AM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Best practice for quorum nodes > > Is there a better way to designate a node as a quorum node, so that > > resources > > do not

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL/centos6 - pacemaker - checking value of PCMK_ipc_buffer

2014-04-22 Thread Nikola Ciprich
Hello David, > what version of libqb and pacemaker are you using? pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.2.x86_64 libqb-0.16.0-2.el6.x86_64 nik > > > best regards > > > > nik > > > > > > > > -- > > - > > Ing. Nikola CIPRICH > > LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. > > 28.rijna 168, 70