[Pacemaker] Pacemaker with vmWare

Hi there! I have the honour to introduce pacemaker on vmWare Clients at my company. I have already worked with several other cluster techniques (including Sun Cluster, Veritas, Fujitsu Primecluster, old Heartbeat, etc.) Thus I'm looking for a sort of "5-Minute-Guide" into using Pacemaker on vmWa

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker with vmWare

Hi there! I just came across http://clusterlabs.org/quickstart.html Maybe this will be enough. - Sorry for bothering! Yours, Herbert Von: Wengatz Herbert Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 10:27 An: 'pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org' Betreff: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker with vmWare Hi there! I have the

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker with vmWare

Am Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014, 10:27:27 schrieb Wengatz Herbert: > Hi there! > > I have the honour to introduce pacemaker on vmWare Clients at my company. > > I have already worked with several other cluster techniques (including Sun > Cluster, Veritas, Fujitsu Primecluster, old Heartbeat, etc.) Thus

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd does abort if a stopped node is specified

Hi, Andrew I would also like to describe the node which has not participated in a cluster to a crmsh file. I understood that uuid was required for a setup of a node as follows from this mail thread. # cat node.crm ### Cluster Option ### property no-quorum-policy="ignore" \ stonith-enable

Re: [Pacemaker] lrmd Memory Usage

Thanks Andrew, much appreciated. I’ll try upgrading to 1.11 and report back with how it goes. On 07/05/2014 01:20, "Andrew Beekhof" wrote: > >On 6 May 2014, at 7:47 pm, Greg Murphy wrote: > >> Here you go - I’ve only run lrmd for 30 minutes since installing the >>debug >> package, but hopefu

Re: [Pacemaker] lrmd Memory Usage

On 7 May 2014, at 8:31 pm, Greg Murphy wrote: > Thanks Andrew, much appreciated. > > I’ll try upgrading to 1.11 and report back with how it goes. At this point it may even be worth trying the .12 release candidate > > > > On 07/05/2014 01:20, "Andrew Beekhof" wrote: > >> >> On 6 May 201

[Pacemaker] Issue in deleting multi state resource

I created a multi state resource ms-2be6c088-a1fa-464a-b00d-f4bccb4f5af2 (vha-2be6c088-a1fa-464a-b00d-f4bccb4f5af2). Here is the configuration: == [root@vsanqa11 ~]# pcs config Cluster Name: vsanqa11_12 Corosync Nodes: Pacemaker Nodes: vsanqa11 vsanqa12 Resources: Maste

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.12 - Release Candidate 1

- Original Message - > From: "Andrew Beekhof" > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" > Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 1:31:27 AM > Subject: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.12 - Release Candidate 1 > > As promised, this announcement brings the first release candidate for > Pacemaker 1.1.1

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd does abort if a stopped node is specified

On 7 May 2014, at 7:53 pm, Yusuke Iida wrote: > Hi, Andrew > > I would also like to describe the node which has not participated in a > cluster to a crmsh file. > > I understood that uuid was required for a setup of a node as follows > from this mail thread. > > # cat node.crm > ### Cluster O

Re: [Pacemaker] Issue in deleting multi state resource

On 8 May 2014, at 12:38 am, K Mehta wrote: > I created a multi state resource ms-2be6c088-a1fa-464a-b00d-f4bccb4f5af2 > (vha-2be6c088-a1fa-464a-b00d-f4bccb4f5af2). > > Here is the configuration: > == > [root@vsanqa11 ~]# pcs config > Cluster Name: vsanqa11_12 > Corosync

[Pacemaker] FYI: GitHub pull requests

For anyone submitting features, nothing changes. However if you're submitting a fix for something you want fixed in 1.1.12, it would be highly appreciated if they were against the 1.1 branch :-) -- Andrew signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail _

[Pacemaker] [Question] About "quorum-policy=freeze" and "promote".

Hi All, I composed Master/Slave resource of three nodes that set quorum-policy="freeze". (I use Stateful in Master/Slave resource.) - Current DC: srv01 (3232238280) - partition with quorum Version: 1.1.11-830af67 3 Nodes configured 9 Resources configured Online:

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd does abort if a stopped node is specified

On Thu, 8 May 2014 09:58:41 +1000 Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > node $id=131 vm01 > > node $id=132 vm02 > > (snip) > > > > Is the method of setting up ID of the node which has not > > participated in a cluster using a corosync stack like this? > > I don;t know how crmsh works, sorry $id= maps di