I was doing a nic firmware upgrade and i forgot to stop the cluster on node
where i was working, but something strange happened, both node are fenced
at the same time.
I'm using sbd as stonith device, with the following parameters.
watchdog time = 10 ; msgwait 20 ; stonith-timeout = 40(pacemaker)
Release candidate 2 is now live!
Please see GitHub for full details and let us know if you find any problems:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.12-rc2
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Matej,
this is really question for pacemaker mailing list.
> Hello,
>
> I have the following setup:
>
> 2 nodes: db-01, db-02
> Groups of resources:
> fs-01: iscsi+lvm+fs at db-01
> fs-02: iscsi+lvm+fs at db-02
>
> fs-01 is for mounting data files for MySQL at db-01, fs-02 for db-02
>
> MySQL
Hi all,
I'm sure many have come across same question and yes i've gone
through most of the blogs and mailing list without much results.
I'm trying to configure XEN HVM DOMU on DRBD replicated partition of
filesystem type ocfs2 using Pacemaker.
My question is what all changes to be done to
Hi All,
I configured a resource on loopback interface and it was assigned correctly
through pacemaker but after a while the ip address was
removed and it was not being monitored.
Can someone help me out the reason for failure???
I couldn't understand why the monitor is also failing.
maybe i wrong, but i think you forgot the cluster logs
2014-06-03 14:34 GMT+02:00 kamal kishi :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sure many have come across same question and yes i've gone
> through most of the blogs and mailing list without much results.
> I'm trying to configure XEN HVM DOMU on DRBD r
On 3 Jun 2014, at 11:26 am, Yusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> About 15 seconds are the time taken in the whole device construction.
> I think that it cannot receive the message from cib during device
> construction since stonith-ng does not return to mainloop.
I'm reasonably sure this is bec
On 4 Jun 2014, at 8:11 am, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 3 Jun 2014, at 11:26 am, Yusuke Iida wrote:
>
>> Hi, Andrew
>>
>> About 15 seconds are the time taken in the whole device construction.
>> I think that it cannot receive the message from cib during device
>> construction since stonith-n
Hi, Andrew
I tested, where a patch is applied to the newest of 1.1 brunches.
metadata of fence_legacy came to be performed only once.
The time concerning device information construction was shortened at
about 2 seconds.
Therefore, the problem is solved.
It was satisfactory although the composition
On 4 Jun 2014, at 1:57 pm, Yusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I tested, where a patch is applied to the newest of 1.1 brunches.
> metadata of fence_legacy came to be performed only once.
> The time concerning device information construction was shortened at
> about 2 seconds.
> Therefore, the
Testing some different scenarios, and after bringing a node back online,
none of the resources move to it unless they are restarted. However
default-resource-stickiness is set to 0, so they should be able to move
around freely.
# pcs status
Cluster name: docker
Last updated: Wed Jun 4 06:09:26 20
11 matches
Mail list logo