Re: [Pacemaker] Trying to figure out a constraint

2014-06-18 Thread Digimer
On 19/06/14 12:06 AM, Digimer wrote: After sending this, I found that adding: handlers { fence-peer "/usr/lib/drbd/crm-fence-peer.sh"; after-resync-target "/usr/lib/drbd/crm-unfence-peer.sh"; } Allowed the constraint to be removed, so eventually node 2 (an-a04n02) eventually promote

Re: [Pacemaker] Trying to figure out a constraint

2014-06-18 Thread Digimer
On 18/06/14 11:42 PM, Digimer wrote: On 18/06/14 12:47 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 18 Jun 2014, at 2:03 pm, Digimer wrote: Hi all, I am trying to setup a basic pacemaker 1.1.10 on RHEL 6.5 with DRBD 8.3.16. I've setup DRBD and configured one clustered LVM volume group using that drbd

Re: [Pacemaker] unmanaged resource - cluster influence - ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem

2014-06-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:11:22AM +, Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern) wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem to mount a cifs share. Additionally I > enabled OCF_CHECK_LEVEL 20 to read/write from the cifs-share during monitor > operation: > > If I block the connection to th

Re: [Pacemaker] DRBD primary/primary + Pacemaker goes into split brain after crm node standby/online

2014-06-18 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 12.06.2014 22:44, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:07:51PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: >> Hi Everybody, >> >> I have an issue with a 2-node Debian Wheezy primary/primary DRBD >> Pacemaker/Corosync configuration. >> >> After a 'crm node standby' then a 'crm node online', the

Re: [Pacemaker] monitor operation

2014-06-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 18 Jun 2014, at 7:34 pm, ESWAR RAO wrote: > Hi All, > > I am having a setup of 3 nodes custer (HB+pacemaker) > > If I add a resource to the cluster, just wanted to know if the monitor > operation is invoked periodically from DC node (or) local node itself does > monitor and report status

[Pacemaker] monitor operation

2014-06-18 Thread ESWAR RAO
Hi All, I am having a setup of 3 nodes custer (HB+pacemaker) If I add a resource to the cluster, just wanted to know if the monitor operation is invoked periodically from DC node (or) local node itself does monitor and report status to DC node. >From logs I could see, for successful monitor oper

Re: [Pacemaker] first monitor action after start of ressource fails - ends up in ressource restart

2014-06-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 18 Jun 2014, at 4:13 pm, Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern) wrote: > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net] > > Sounds like apache is saying "done" for the start action before its actually > started. > I believe more recent versions of the agent beha