On 11 Aug 2014, at 10:10 pm, Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research Institute
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to Pacemaker 1.1.12, I have been able to setup a (very?) large cluster:
Thats certainly up there as one of the biggest :)
Have you checked pacemaker's CPU usage during startup/failover? I'd be
i
- Original Message -
> Greetings,
>
> We are using pacemaker and cman in a two-node cluster with no-quorum-policy:
> ignore and stonith-enabled: false on a Centos 6 system (pacemaker related
> RPM versions are listed below). We are seeing some bizarre (to us) behavior
> when a node is fu
Greetings,
We are using pacemaker and cman in a two-node cluster with no-quorum-policy:
ignore and stonith-enabled: false on a Centos 6 system (pacemaker related RPM
versions are listed below). We are seeing some bizarre (to us) behavior when a
node is fully lost (e.g. reboot -nf ). Here's t
Hello,
Thanks to Pacemaker 1.1.12, I have been able to setup a (very?) large cluster:
Last updated: Mon Aug 11 13:40:14 2014
Last change: Mon Aug 11 13:37:55 2014
Stack: classic openais (with plugin)
Current DC: bc1hx5a05 - partition with quorum
Version: 1.1.12-561c4cf
22 Nodes configured, 22 exp
During the last days I compiled the current trunk of pacemaker with gcc 4.4 in
OpenIndiana.
I checked the binaries with the current trunk of corosync and libqb.
The change is compatible with Solaris and Illumos based OS like OpenIndiana,
SmartOS, Nexenta, OmniOS.
A pull request is waiting in htt
