Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net writes:
Maybe not, the collocation should be sufficient, but even without the
orders, unclean VMs fencing is tried with other Stonith devices.
Which other devices? The config you sent through didnt have any
others.
Sorry I sent it to linux-cluster
Given a 2 node pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3 cluster with nodes node5
and node6 I saw an unknown third node being added to the cluster,
but only on node5:
Sep 18 22:52:16 node5 corosync[17321]: [pcmk ] notice: pcmk_peer_update:
Transitional membership event on ring 12: memb=2, new=0, lost=0
Sep
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Ken Gaillot [mailto:kjgai...@gleim.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2014 7:24 AM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] runing abitrary script when resource fails
On 10/06/2014 06:20 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
Is it possible to
Hello Andrew,
Am 06.10.2014 04:30, schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
On 3 Oct 2014, at 5:07 am, Felix Zachlod fz.li...@sis-gmbh.info wrote:
Am 02.10.2014 18:02, schrieb Digimer:
On 02/10/14 02:44 AM, Felix Zachlod wrote:
I am currently running 8.4.5 on to of Debian Wheezy with Pacemaker 1.1.7
On 8 Oct 2014, at 9:20 am, Felix Zachlod fz.li...@sis-gmbh.info wrote:
Hello Andrew,
Am 06.10.2014 04:30, schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
On 3 Oct 2014, at 5:07 am, Felix Zachlod fz.li...@sis-gmbh.info wrote:
Am 02.10.2014 18:02, schrieb Digimer:
On 02/10/14 02:44 AM, Felix Zachlod wrote:
I
On 8 Oct 2014, at 2:09 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian) br...@interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
Given a 2 node pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3 cluster with nodes node5
and node6 I saw an unknown third node being added to the cluster,
but only on node5:
Is either node using dhcp?
I would guess node6 got a new
