[Pacemaker] Impossible rules ?

Hello, I am testing a new configuration and have problems with two things. First of them is, one clone, one master/slave and one group. The group could run only in the node which has the master/slave in master role but the group needs also a clone instance running. I have the next but it is not

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker compilation problem

El 08/02/10 16:04, Andrew Beekhof escribió: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Adrian Chapela > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to reinstall a compilation of Pacemaker+Corosync but I can't >> compile Corosync on one machine. For me is very strange be

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker compilation problem

El 08/02/10 16:04, Andrew Beekhof escribió: > [snip] >> checking for ll_cluster_new in -lhbclient... no >> > looks like you dont have the heartbeat development libs/headers installed > This is the log in the machine that compilation is working: configure: Using installed ltdl checking bzli

[Pacemaker] Pacemaker compilation problem

Hello, I am trying to reinstall a compilation of Pacemaker+Corosync but I can't compile Corosync on one machine. For me is very strange because the other can compile without any problem. The problem is at configuration time, I don't know which file is looking for, I don't want to compile with ope

[Pacemaker] Corosync+Pacemaker multistate failed rule

Hello, I have this rules: DRBD-Samba and DRBD-Mail are two multi-state resources. Only one of node is Master. As I can read in the rules, I know that correo2 will be the Master of DRBD-Mail and cor

Re: [Pacemaker] Failed compilation again

Andrew Beekhof escribió: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Chapela wrote: Michael Schwartzkopff escribió: Am Montag, 2. November 2009 13:03:37 schrieb Adrian Chapela: configure:23383: result: no configure:23416: checking for glue_config.h configure:23424: result: no

Re: [Pacemaker] Failed compilation again

Michael Schwartzkopff escribió: Am Montag, 2. November 2009 13:03:37 schrieb Adrian Chapela: configure:23383: result: no configure:23416: checking for glue_config.h configure:23424: result: no configure:23446: error: Core development headers were not found See `config.log' for more de

[Pacemaker] Failed compilation again

Hello I am trying to compile Pacemaker again. I am following instructions http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install#From_Source With this: ./configure --prefix=/ --with-lcrso-dir=/usr/libexec/lcrso/ --disable-fatal-warnings or with this ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-lcrso-dir=/usr/libexec/lcr

Re: [Pacemaker] iLO2 stonith device

help? A bit at least? -Original Message- From: Adrian Chapela [mailto:achapela.rexist...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:14 PM To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] iLO2 stonith device Dejan Muhamedagic escribió: Hi, On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:32:59PM +

Re: [Pacemaker] iLO2 stonith device

Dejan Muhamedagic escribió: Hi, On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 17:13, Adrian Chapela wrote: One more time. I have decided to use external/riloe as my stonith device but I have some doubts. My system will be a cluster of two

[Pacemaker] iLO2 stonith device

One more time. I have decided to use external/riloe as my stonith device but I have some doubts. My system will be a cluster of two nodes. First, Do I need to config riloe stonith as a clone ? Second, this stonith device have some parameters of configuration: hostlist, ilo_hostname, ilo_user

Re: [Pacemaker] IPMI Stonith

Lars Marowsky-Bree escribió: > On 2009-01-20T17:21:39, Adrian Chapela wrote: > > >> It is accessed over lan, you need a server with "IPMI over LAN" like >> Integrated Lights-Out from HP, most known as iLo ( >> http://h18013.www1.hp.com/products

Re: [Pacemaker] IPMI Stonith

Andreas Mock escribió: >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: "Dejan Muhamedagic" >> Gesendet: 20.01.09 16:47:04 >> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager >> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] IPMI Stonith >> > > > >>> Ok, but what about a kernel panic ? when the OS hungs up the other nod

Re: [Pacemaker] IPMI Stonith

Dejan Muhamedagic escribió: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:14:00PM +0100, Adrian Chapela wrote: > >> Dejan Muhamedagic escribi?: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:00:50PM +0100, Adrian Chapela wrote: >>>

Re: [Pacemaker] IPMI Stonith

Dejan Muhamedagic escribió: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:00:50PM +0100, Adrian Chapela wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I am thinking again on the stonith. IPMI could be an option, but is it >> really a good option for production ? What happen if the netw

[Pacemaker] IPMI Stonith

Hello! I am thinking again on the stonith. IPMI could be an option, but is it really a good option for production ? What happen if the network break down ? Is totally resolved the split brain ? Have you tested with HP Proliant Servers ? Thank you! _