Can you include a crm_report for your test scenario?
a) I need the pe files, but also b) parsing line wrapped logs is seriously
painful
On 05/07/2013, at 7:09 PM, Martin Gazak wrote:
> Hello,
> we are facing the problem with the simple (I hope) cluster configuration
> with 2 nodes ims0 and ims
On 06/07/2013, at 1:28 AM, Andrii Moiseiev wrote:
> Any clues?
Not with only fragments of the logs
Do you have a log file (not syslog) configured? I'll need that complete file
If you could also set PCMK_trace_function=apply_xml_diff (see
http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2013/pacemaker-loggi
On 08/07/2013, at 11:35 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Thanks Florian.
>
> The problem I have is that I'd like to define a HA configuration that isn't
> dependent on a specific set of fencing hardware (or any fencing hardware at
> all for that matter) and as the stack has the quorum capability in
On 09/07/2013, at 12:50 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> thank you for your recommendations.
> I just hoped that there is something pacemaker internal,
> e.g. like sending traps via snmp or something like that.
This is something crm_mon can now send traps, emails or call scripts for.
>
the agent and config.
I'm glad you've got it working, but its hard to discuss whether an agent is
correct/sane without knowing more about it.
>
> Additions and corrections welcome for all
> fence agent programmers.
>
> Best regards
> Andreas Mock
>
>
>
&
On 08/07/2013, at 5:57 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I'm taking the builds from
> http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-test-next/rhel-6/x86_64/
> to avoid compiling on my own.
> Do these build relate to the release candidates you're announcing?
Not at all, those are whatever I happen to be t
On 06/07/2013, at 1:22 AM, Digimer wrote:
> Andrew might know the trick. In theory, putting your agent into the /usr/sbin
> or /sbin directory (where ever the other agents are)
Yep. As long as its there, executable and takes arguments via stdin...
> should "just work". You're sure the exit co
On 05/07/2013, at 5:34 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wrote a stonith agent which IMHO implements the
> API spec found at https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/FenceAgentAPI.
>
> But it seems it has a problem when used as pacemaker stonith device.
>
> What has to be done, to hav
y message level filtering is done?
There is no filtering.
>
> Best regards
> Andreas
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2013 13:41
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>
On 04/07/2013, at 7:24 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think about safest way to expanding the cluster, and my observations
> show that new nodes are always added in the "online" state
> (standby="off"). I would like nodes to appear in standby="on" state
> unless they can be fenced im
On 04/07/2013, at 8:37 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 04.07.2013 um 12:02 schrieb andreas graeper :
>>
>> i tried to change the IPaddr2 parameter ip
>>
>> 1) crm resource edit
>>
>> 2) pcs resource update =
>>
>> in both cases the cib is modified (`crm configure show` shows)
>> but old
On 04/07/2013, at 7:24 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi digimer,
>
> I would like to take your offer and asking the following:
>
> The API documents says nothing about the correct way
> of giving messages back to the stonith daemon.
> So, what is the right way to write error/warn/info messages.
>
On 21/06/2013, at 11:36 PM, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> n1 active node is started and everything works fine, but after reboot n2
> drbd is not started by pacemaker.
Are you sure?
I see a couple of start operations:
Jun 21 15:10:29 [5093] n2 lrmd:debug: operation_finished:
dr
I wouldn't be doing anything without corosync2 and its option that requires all
nodes to be online before quorum is granted.
Otherwise I can imagine ways that the old master might try to promote itself.
On 02/07/2013, at 7:18 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Juli 2013, 09:47:3
On 02/07/2013, at 8:20 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-07-02T20:12:08, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> It seems related to the number of times I poll the CIB, too; I seem to
>>> hit a transient window there, maybe. Since I dropped the number of polls
>>>
On 02/07/2013, at 7:54 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-07-02T08:25:18, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> if (cli_config_update(&cib_copy, NULL, FALSE) == FALSE) {
>> Also, change FALSE -> TRUE here so that you see the validation errors.
>
On 02/07/2013, at 7:32 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-07-02T10:46:09, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> Our problem is that if i give "crm resource stop vm1" and immediatly after
>>> "crm resource stop vm2"
>>> it happens that p
Is "How important is the ability to use redundant PDUs for fencing?" better?
On 02/07/2013, at 3:30 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 02.07.2013 03:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 02/07/2013, at 8:51 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 0
On 02/07/2013, at 12:12 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-07-01T14:15:01, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
>> Reproducible on the non-DC node during full start-up of a cluster, yes.
>
> And it turns out to be a CIB problem afterall. Or I'm doing something
> else wrong:
>
> I'm doing, basica
Apparently CC'ing the list on my replies was too subtle... can you please sign
up to and reply to the mailing list?
I don't do private support.
On 28/06/2013, at 10:48 PM, Sartoratti Lorenzo
wrote:
> Our problem is that if i give "crm resource stop vm1" and immediatly after
> "crm resource st
On 02/07/2013, at 8:51 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 01/07/2013, at 10:19 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 01.07.2013 15:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> And if people start using it, then we might look at simplifying it.
>>
&
On 01/07/2013, at 10:28 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just want to get clear about startup fencing.
>
> Scenario: RHEL 6.4, cman, 2-node-cluster, pacemaker,
> fence via pcmk-redirect. pacemaker stonith enabled,
> no-quorum-policy=ignore, CMAN_QUORUM_TIMEOUT=0
>
>
> When should a star
On 01/07/2013, at 10:19 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 01.07.2013 15:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> And if people start using it, then we might look at simplifying it.
>
> May be it's worth to have anonymous poll at clusterlabs.org for that?
On 02/07/2013, at 2:58 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 12:43 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> On 2013-07-01T11:53:29, Digimer wrote:
>>
>>> You are right, of course. Imagine though that the IPMI BMC's network
>>> port or cable could have silently failed some time before the node
>>> failed.
On 02/07/2013, at 2:13 AM, Digimer wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but people around here also tend to be quite vocal when they think
>> something is missing.
>> More so if its something critical.
>
>
I mean more than you, Jake and Vladislav.
That's not quite a party yet :-)
_
On 02/07/2013, at 12:12 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-07-01T14:15:01, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
>> Reproducible on the non-DC node during full start-up of a cluster, yes.
>
> And it turns out to be a CIB problem afterall. Or I'm doing something
> else wrong:
>
> I'm doing, basica
On 01/07/2013, at 10:06 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 01.07.2013 14:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 01/07/2013, at 9:45 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 01.07.2013 14:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>>> I'm yet t
On 01/07/2013, at 9:53 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-07-01T21:37:38, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> And apparently, this is one of the scenarios for which fence topology
>>> was created and supports multiple devices per level. I'd venture the
>>> o
On 01/07/2013, at 9:45 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 01.07.2013 14:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> ...
>>>> I'm yet to be convinced that having two PDUs is helping those people in
>>>> the first place.
>>>> If it were actually useful, I suspect mo
On 28/06/2013, at 10:48 PM, Sartoratti Lorenzo
wrote:
> Hi
> Il 06/28/2013 12:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof ha scritto:
>> On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite
On 30/06/2013, at 4:48 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-29T09:22:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> This doesn't help people who have dual power rails/PDUs for power
>>> redundancy.
>> I'm yet to be convinced that having two PDUs is helping those
On 01/07/2013, at 5:17 PM, Florian Crouzat wrote:
> Le 29/06/2013 01:22, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
>>
>> On 29/06/2013, at 12:22 AM, Digimer wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 28/06/2013, at 5:22
On 01/07/2013, at 5:32 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 29.06.2013 02:22, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 29/06/2013, at 12:22 AM, Digimer wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, L
On 30/06/2013, at 10:09 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sbd connects to the CIB and watches updates come in to see if pacemaker
> considers the node healthy still, and if the cluster partition is
> quorate according to the CIB. That's all working fine.
>
> But I've noticed that during
On 29/06/2013, at 12:36 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-28T10:20:56, Digimer wrote:
>
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr="an-p01" pcmk_reboot_action="off" port="1"
pcmk_host_list="an-c03n01.alteeve.ca"
primitive fence_n01_p
On 29/06/2013, at 12:22 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer wrote:
>>>
>>>> primitive fence_n01_psu1_off st
On 29/06/2013, at 12:15 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 08:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Under this model, not only do I have to find the time to write and test the
>> new addition, but I also have to:
>> * keep maintaining the old code until... when?
>> * pr
On 28/06/2013, at 11:37 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure there's a huge downside in it for you?
>> Ok, lets take attrd for example - which I've been wanted to rewrite to be
>> truly atomic for half a decade or more.
>
> If it's rewritten in a way that doesn't affect external
On 28/06/2013, at 9:16 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 28/06/2013, at 8:10 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 28/06/2013, at 6:42 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Andrew,
>>>
>>> El 27/06/13 14:44, Andrew Beekhof escr
On 28/06/2013, at 8:59 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-28T18:41:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> There's an exception: dropping commonly used external interfaces (say,
>>> "ptest") needs to be announced a few releases in advance before e
On 27/06/2013, at 10:46 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2013, at 9:44 PM, Francesco Namuri wrote:
>
>>> Can you attach /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-64.bz2 from SERVERNAME1 please?
>>>
>>> I'll be able to see if its something we've already f
On 28/06/2013, at 8:10 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 28/06/2013, at 6:42 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
>
>> Hello Andrew,
>>
>> El 27/06/13 14:44, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
>>> You should see additional logs sent to /var/log/pacemaker.log
>>
On 28/06/2013, at 8:46 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-28T20:21:22, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> It looks correct, but not quite sane. ;-) That seems not to be
>>> something you can address, though. I'm thinking that fencing topology
>>>
On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti
wrote:
> Hi,
> we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite satisfied: thanks!
> We have 30 virtual machines running in the cluster and maintained by
> pacemaker.
> When we stop the machines with crm, they are not stopped in parallel but
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer wrote:
>
>> primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
>>params ipaddr="an-p01" pcmk_reboot_action="off" port="1"
>> pcmk_host_list="an-c03n01.alteeve.ca"
>> primitive fence_n01_psu1_on st
On 28/06/2013, at 6:42 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> El 27/06/13 14:44, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
>> You should see additional logs sent to /var/log/pacemaker.log
>
> Finally yesterday issue happened again. This time, node "selavi" was
On 28/06/2013, at 5:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-28T11:11:00, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>>> Maybe you're right, maybe I should stop fighting it and go with the
>>>> firefox approach.
>>>> That certainly seemed to piss a lot of
On 27/06/2013, at 2:21 AM, Саша Александров wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Fencing is disabled for now, the issue is not with fencing: the question is -
> why only one out of three DRBD master-slave sets is recognized by pacemaker,
Pacemaker knows nothing of drbd or any other kind of service.
All that know
On 27/06/2013, at 3:40 AM, andreas graeper wrote:
> thanks four your answer.
> but still question open.
>
> when i switch off the active node: though this is done reliable for me, the
> still passive node wants to know for sure and will kill the (already dead)
> former active node.
> i have
On 28/06/2013, at 12:52 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> Maybe you're right, maybe I should stop fighting it and go with the
>> firefox approach.
>> That certainly seemed to piss a lot of people off though...
>
> If there's one message I've learned in 13 years of work on Linux HA,
> then it is
On 25/06/2013, at 9:44 PM, Francesco Namuri wrote:
>> Can you attach /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-64.bz2 from SERVERNAME1 please?
>>
>> I'll be able to see if its something we've already fixed.
Nope still there. I will attempt to fix this tomorrow.
___
On 27/06/2013, at 10:29 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ohhh, sorry, but I have deleted node selavi and restarted, and now works
> OK and I can't reproduce the bug :(
That is unfortunate
>
> El 27/06/13 12:32, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
>> o,
On 27/06/2013, at 1:53 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:33:30 +1000
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> When you run ./autogen.sh it tries to start an rpm command, this
>>> failed because I didn't had rpm installed.
>>
>> How did it
On 27/06/2013, at 5:40 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-27T14:28:19, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't say the 6 months between 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 was a particularly
>> aggressive release cycle.
>
> For the amount of changes in there, I think yes. An
On 27/06/2013, at 8:20 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
> ¿Do you think it's a configuration problem?
No, more likely a bug. Which is concerning since I thought I had this
particular kind ironed out.
Could you set PCMK_trace_functions=crm_get_peer on selavi and repeat the test?
The exact
On 26/06/2013, at 10:37 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-26T21:31:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> Distributions can take care of them when they integrate them; basically
>>> they'll trickle through until the whole stack the distributions ship
>>&g
On 26/06/2013, at 7:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-25T20:28:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps a numbering scheme like the Linux kernel would fit better than a
>>> stable/unstable branch distinction. Changes that deserve the "unstable"
&g
On 26/06/2013, at 12:24 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 07:29 AM, andreas graeper wrote:
>> hi,
>> maybe again and again the same question, please excuse.
>>
>> two nodes (n1 active / n2 passive) and `service corosync stop` on active.
>> does the node, that is going down, tells the other tha
On 26/06/2013, at 6:51 PM, Denis Witt
wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:35:33 +1000
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> System is Debian Wheezy which means version 0.11.1-2 for libqb-dev.
>
>> rpm errors on debian?
>> I'm confused.
>
> When you run .
Sent from a mobile device
On 26/06/2013, at 5:44 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:35:03 +1000
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Urgh:
>>
>> infoJun 25 13:40:10 lrmd_ipc_connect(913):0: Connecting to lrmd
>> trace Jun 25 13:40:10 pick_ipc_bu
On 26/06/2013, at 3:01 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:12:15 +0200
> Denis Witt wrote:
>
>> ./configure runs fine, but make didn't. I don't remember the exact
>> error message and before I could run it again I have to solve my
>> OCFS2-Problem. But I'll try again and post it he
On 25/06/2013, at 5:37 PM, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> Hi,
> after an update to the new debian stable, from pacemaker 1.0.9.1 to
> 1.1.7 I'm getting some strange errors on syslog:
Thats a hell of a jump there.
Can you attach /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-64.bz2 from SERVERNAME1 please?
I'll be able
On 25/06/2013, at 6:32 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-25T10:16:58, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>> Ok, I recently became engaged in the PСMK, so for me it is a surprize.
>> The more so in all the major linux distributions version 1.1.х.
>
> Pacemaker has very strong regression and syst
On 25/06/2013, at 5:56 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:50:14 +0300
> Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> I would recommend qb 1.4.4. 1.4.3 had at least one nasty bug which
>> affects pacemaker.
>
> Just tried that. It didn't help.
Can you turn on the blockbox please?
Details at h
On 25/06/2013, at 4:34 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:10:13 +1000
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 24/06/2013, at 9:31 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> After I have upgraded Pacemaker from 1.1.8 to 1.1.9 on a node I get
>&
On 25/06/2013, at 2:33 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 25.06.2013, 04:46, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 24/06/2013, at 3:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>> Either people have given up on te
On 25/06/2013, at 1:20 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> 2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
>>
>> On 25/06/2013, at 12:12 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>
>>> 2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
>>>>
>>>> On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrot
On 24/06/2013, at 7:45 PM, Michael Furman wrote:
> > What kind of status?
>
>
> We want to run one command that will return the status of the node in one
> value: online or offline (or standby).
>
> Please find attached 3 core files.
I can't read the core files. They're specific to your m
On 24/06/2013, at 7:45 PM, Michael Furman wrote:
> > What kind of status?
>
>
> We want to run one command that will return the status of the node in one
> value: online or offline (or standby).
That could reasonably be added to crm_node.
___
Pa
On 25/06/2013, at 12:12 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> 2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
>>
>> On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> 2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof :
>>>>
>>>> On 24/06/2013, at
On 24/06/2013, at 8:37 PM, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> crm_mon -rA1 shows :
>
> ClusterIP(ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):Started lisel1
> Master/Slave Set: ms_drbd_r0 [p_drbd_r0]
> Masters: [ lisel1 ]
> Slaves: [ lisel2 ]
> p_lvm_r0(ocf::heartbeat:LVM):Started lisel1
>
On 24/06/2013, at 8:55 PM, Munehiro SATO wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can resource agents know the cause of stop action?
Not really, no.
>
> I want to know following situations in RA for my application(it's
> Master/Slave resource).
>
> * stop by "crm resource stop"
> In this case, my application
On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> 2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof :
>>
>> On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> I received similar error using 6ea4b7e(HEAD) under
On 24/06/2013, at 3:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the
>> final release.
>
> Is it going to be 1.1.10 or 1.2.0 (2.0.0)?
First its going to be 1.1.10 and,
On 22/06/2013, at 5:31 AM, Denis Witt wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> might be offtopic but I'm sure there are may People on this List who had
> answered this question for themselfs.
>
> I have a MySQL Master/Master/Slave setup which is rather unreliable, so i'm
> asking myself if it might be better
On 24/06/2013, at 9:31 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>
> After I have upgraded Pacemaker from 1.1.8 to 1.1.9 on a node I get the
> following errors
> in my syslog and Pacemaker doesn't seem to be able to start services on this
> node.
What else did you upgrade? libqb too?
>
> Jun 24 13:19:44
On 24/06/2013, at 6:29 PM, Michael Furman wrote:
> Andrew,
> I have send the core files attached to mail from Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013
> 13:18:04 +0300. Unfortunately the mail server did not sent it.
> Can you look on the mail server?
100s of spam messages but nothing from you.
Please send them
rtbeat/attrd
> /usr/lib64/heartbeat/cib
> /usr/lib64/heartbeat/crmd
> /usr/lib64/heartbeat/pengine
> /usr/lib64/heartbeat/stonithd
> /usr/sbin/crm_uuid
> make: *** [rpm] Error 1
> -
>
> Regards,
> Takatoshi MATSUO
>
> 2013/6/21 Andrew Beekhof :
Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the final
release.
So just a reminder, we're particularly looking for feedback in the following
areas:
| plugin-based clusters, ACLs, the new –ban and –clear commands, and admin
actions
| (such as moving and stopping resour
On 21/06/2013, at 5:38 PM, Thibaut Pouzet
wrote:
> Le 20/06/2013 12:23, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
>> On 20/06/2013, at 6:51 PM, Thibaut Pouzet
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 19/06/2013 23:57, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
>>>> On 20/06/2013, at 1:57 AM, T
On 22/06/2013, at 5:13 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> my two cents to your questions:
>
> a) If you want to learn most, take any distro and compile the components from
> source and afterwards use them. => Most learned.
Well, yes, but not always about clustering and not always thi
h?
>
> Thx,
> CB
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 8:03 PM
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Starting Pacemaker Cluster Manager: [FAILED]
>
On 20/06/2013, at 8:49 PM, Michael Furman wrote:
> Sending the second mail without attachments - the first one with with
> attachments :)
I don't see the one with attachments.
Did you paste the output from gdb in them?
>
> From: michael_fur...@hotmail.com
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Just this is also sufficient:
index 930f8b5..483f94d 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ LIBQB_LOG=1
PCMK_FEATURES="$PCMK_FEATURES libqb-logging libqb-ipc"
if
- !pkg-config --atleast-version 0.13 libqb
+ ! pkg-config --atleast-version 0.13 libqb
then
AC_
On 20/06/2013, at 11:22 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
> Hi, again.
> Still one week ago package normaly rebuilding.
> Today, I resive error:
Just remove all references to clusterlib-devel from pacemaker.spec.in
I'll see what I can do
>
> # make rpm-dep
> if [ x != x`which yum-builddep 2>/dev/null
On 20/06/2013, at 11:50 PM, Doug Clow wrote:
> I'll do some experiments to see if I can get Corosync more reliable. I'm
> using Corosync v1 as part of cman-corosync-pacemaker. RRP with one port on a
> switch and the other port on a crossover cable between the two hosts
> (although technical
On 20/06/2013, at 6:51 PM, Thibaut Pouzet
wrote:
> Le 19/06/2013 23:57, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
>> On 20/06/2013, at 1:57 AM, Thibaut Pouzet
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to configure fencing on a test platform with two nodes
On 20/06/2013, at 5:02 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 20.06.2013 09:00, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 20/06/2013, at 2:52 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 20.06.2013 00:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 20/06/201
On 20/06/2013, at 2:52 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 20.06.2013 00:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 20/06/2013, at 6:33 AM, Doug Clow wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> I have some 2-node active-passive clusters that occasionally lose
>
On 20/06/2013, at 1:57 AM, Thibaut Pouzet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to configure fencing on a test platform with two nodes under
> corosync+cman+pacemaker on CentOS 6.4. Both nodes have a double power supply
> from a WTI NPS-8HD16-3. IPMI fencing works like a charm, however I cannot get
On 20/06/2013, at 6:33 AM, Doug Clow wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have some 2-node active-passive clusters that occasionally lose Corosync
> connectivity. The connectivity is fixed with a reboot. They don't have
> shared storage so stonith doesn't have to happen for another node to take
> con
Try the default multicast address perhaps?
address = "225.0.0.12";
You checked /etc/cluster/fence_xvm.key match on both machines I assume?
On 17/06/2013, at 4:09 AM, Digimer wrote:
> Guest's firewall is off entirely, as is selinux.
>
> On 06/16/2013 02:25 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> 16.0
On 18/06/2013, at 11:58 PM, Michael Furman wrote:
> I was able to run the ClusterMon agent.
>
> Couple of comments:
> 1. When I uses ocf:pacemaker:ClusterMon it crashes a lot with the
> following core file:
>
> file core.22992
> core.22992: ELF 64-bit LSB core file x86-64, version 1 (SY
On 19/06/2013, at 2:23 AM, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> i use s_xxx.sh and k_xxx.sh scripts to create / remove resources xxx
>
> when after removing a resource, i call crm_mon, i can see lots of resources
> are stopped.
> little later they are started again.
>
> does a
> pcs resource s
rvice cman start" or "service corosync start"?
>
>
> Can you provide a link to a newer pacemaker package compatible with UBUNTU
> 11.10 Server?
No. The debian/ubuntu people like to do their own thing.
>
> R,
> CB
>
> -Original Message-
>
On 18/06/2013, at 8:30 PM, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> pacemaker is started as plugin from corosync
> but when i `service corosync stop` there are still
> pacemaker/lrmd
> pacemaker/pengine
>
> is this a problem / error ?
quite likely, yes
>
> thanks
> andreas
>
>
> 2013/6/18 andrea
On 18/06/2013, at 9:47 PM, Nikita Michalko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried build/compile the last version of pacemeker from sources
> (http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2013/release-candidate-1-dot-1-10-rc3/)
> on SLES11/SP2 (kernel 3.0.58-0.6.2-default) with libqb-0.14.4 as follows:
> ./configure
On 18/06/2013, at 2:23 PM, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
>
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 12:12 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18/06/2013, at 1:46 PM, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
On 18/06/2013, at 1:46 PM, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18/06/2013, at 7:19 AM, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
>>
>>> tl;dr summary: On EC2, we can't reuse IP addresses, and we need a reliable,
uot;ext3" \
> > meta target-role="Started"
> > As I assume this resource can only be started on 1 node, I think it should
> > be stopped automatically when pacemaker detects it's not in a HA cluster.
> > Is this incorrect assumption?
>
1001 - 1100 of 4430 matches
Mail list logo
