On 18/06/2013, at 7:19 AM, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
> tl;dr summary: On EC2, we can't reuse IP addresses, and we need a reliable,
> scriptable procedure for replacing a dead (guaranteed no longer running)
> server with another one without needing to take the remaining cluster members
> down.
Th
attribute name.
Almost all symbols except _ would make sense to avoid.
>
> The cause by which core was made is because the outside of the range
> of a memory was referred to, when the character string beyond
> QB_LOG_MAX_LEN is passed to libqb.
> About it, it corrected below.
On 18/06/2013, at 3:09 AM, Colin Blair wrote:
> All,
> Newbie here. I am trying to create a two-node cluster with the following:
>
> Ubuntu Server 11.10
> Pacemaker 1.1.5
> Corosync Cluster Engine 1.3.0
> CMAN
>
> I am unable to start Pacemaker. CMAN seems to run with Corosync fine. I see
Apart form anything else, multicast continues to be broken in many kernels.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035
Run:
tcpdump -i virbr0 port zented
in another window and everything will magically start working.
On 16/06/2013, at 3:26 AM, Digimer wrote:
> Ah, I think it's
On 15/06/2013, at 5:27 AM, Simon Platten
wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> I have made some progress, but I am still struggling to get pacemaker to
> build on ARM Cortex-A8. Is there a build or source available that will
> compile on a beaglebone black with ARM Cortex-A8?
Not having access to hard
On 15/06/2013, at 12:25 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-14T10:50:21, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> If I had my way, they'd
>> - have env variables the same as OCF
>> - be executable from the command line like the RH ones
>
> (I'm not su
On 14/06/2013, at 2:14 PM, Nikita Staroverov wrote:
>> Its certainly possible to build a decent 2-node cluster, but there are
>> several non-obvious steps that are required - preventing fencing loops being
>> one. For this reason I cannot recommend them for newcomers, because they are
>> also
n a HA cluster.
> Is this incorrect assumption?
No. But I'd need to see logs from all the nodes (please use attachments) to be
able to comment further.
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 13/06/2013, at 2:43 PM, Xiaomin Zh
On 13/06/2013, at 6:10 PM, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> i use ocf:heartbeat to nfs-export the mounted /dev/drbd0 on drbd:master node.
> n1:master n2:slave
> n1 -> standby
> n2 takes over (well done)
> n1 reboot
> n1 online
> n2 standby
> now exportfs still started on n2 (unmanaged) FAILED
Perhaps check out crm_mon --external-agent
On 14/06/2013, at 12:47 AM, Michael Furman wrote:
> Hi all!
> I want to execute some actions when active / standby nodes are changed.
> I want to do the following:
> 1. Send SMTP mail
> 2. Add message to syslog
> 3. Execute my script
>
On 14/06/2013, at 6:26 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 10:51 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> On 2013-06-11T09:34:10, Digimer wrote:
>>
>>> If you have any trouble, please don't hesitate to ask here and we will do
>>> our best to help.
>>
>> I wonder what the perspective is on standardiz
On 13/06/2013, at 9:55 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 12.06.2013, 03:45, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 12/06/2013, at 4:48 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013, 22:33:32 schrieb Andrey Groshev:
>>>> Hi
m: "Lars Marowsky-Bree"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Cc: "Michael Schwartzkopff"
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Two resource nodes + one quorum node
>
>
> On 2013-06-13T07:45:09, Andrew B
On 13/06/2013, at 7:33 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-13T07:45:09, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> Its certainly possible to build a decent 2-node cluster, but there are
>> several non-obvious steps that are required - preventing fencing loops being
>> one
On 13/06/2013, at 7:34 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-13T07:48:46, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> In my opinion the user doesn´t have any rights although the user is in
>>> haclient group and having no role/user configuration. Is it right?
>> No. Us
On 13/06/2013, at 2:43 PM, Xiaomin Zhang wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof writes:
>
>>
>> Try increasing your stickiness as it is being exceeded by the location
> constraints.
>> For the biggest stick, try 'infinity' which means - never move unless the
> node
On 12/06/2013, at 6:08 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-12T09:09:31, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
>
>> Especially I would like to find out how many nodes are in a cluster and how
>> many nodes are online. Perhaps somebody could post a code snipplet here.
>
> I think you might find
On 12/06/2013, at 3:13 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013, 08:06:43 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> > On 08/06/2013, at 6:49 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
> > wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2013, 14:08:26 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> > > >
On 12/06/2013, at 4:02 PM, ESWAR RAO wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a 3 node setup with heartbeat+pacemaker.
>
> After some time I observed that "Current DC:" keeps on changing between the 3
> nodes.
That means something it probably crashing, a lot.
> I also observed that the monitoring of res
Is there an attribute like '#node'or '#nodename'?
>
> Best regards
> Andreas Mock
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013 06:45
> An: The Pacemaker cluster re
>> is 1.1.10-rc1 a working title or can the package be found somewhere?
>>
>> Its currently just a tag.
>> Grabbing the source tree and running "make TAG=Pacemaker-1.1.10-rc1 rpm"
>> will give you packages.
>>
>>
>> I saw that on h
On 13/06/2013, at 1:57 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 03:06 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013, 09:42:13 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
>> > On 12/06/2013, at 4:48 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff
>> wrote:
>> > > Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2
On 13/06/2013, at 1:42 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi Digimer,
>
> oh...sorry...just stonithed the server while
> trying to reverse engineer the fence api...
Nah, it was probably just the NSA taking a backup.
>
> ;)
>
> Best regards
> Andreas Mock
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Seems up now... I didn't do anything
On 13/06/2013, at 12:41 AM, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Michael Schwartzkopff"
>> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:21:08 AM
>> Subject: [Pacemaker] clusterlabs.org down?
>
> y
On 12/06/2013, at 8:42 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:21:11PM +0200, andreas graeper wrote:
>> hi,
>> when
>> crm node online|standby
>> i get this error message :
>> Cannot change active directory to /var/lib/pacemaker/cores/root: No such
>> file or directory
What version of libqb is installed?
It doesn't appear to have been installed with yum/rpm.
On 05/06/2013, at 7:56 PM, yusuke iida wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> crmd took out core in the environment which I am using, and the
> phenomenon of stopping occurred.
>
> Pacemaker currently used is the follo
k
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013 00:27
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] uname eq node-name
>
>
> On 11/06/2013, at 2:33 AM, Andrea
On 09/06/2013, at 12:19 PM, Xiaomin Zhang wrote:
> Hello, Pacemaker Gurus:
> My HA (2 active/slave nodes and 1 standby node) setup contains 1 DRBD
> master/slave resource group, and 1 simple lsb resource. I configure some
> location constraints to prefer the active node, and I also want
> resour
On 06/06/2013, at 4:03 PM, ESWAR RAO wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can someone please help me in below scenario:
>
> I want my daemon running on 2 nodes to be monitored using HB+pacemaker.
> The daemon is already running before the RA is configured using crm,
>
> #crm configure primitive my_daemon lsb
On 11/06/2013, at 10:05 PM, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to wrap my head around the pacemaker, and setting up postgresql
> cluster using pcs on centos 6.4.
>
> I used so far following commands to set it up. And this seems to work, but
> all nodes are running as slaves
On 12/06/2013, at 4:48 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013, 22:33:32 schrieb Andrey Groshev:
> > Hi,
> > I want to make Postgres cluster.
> > As far as I understand, for the proper functioning of the cluster must use a
> > quorum (ie, at least three nodes).
>
> No. Tw
ewhere it shouldn't be before starting
it where it should".
This happens before _any_ resources are started, including your symlink
resource.
> thanks
> andreas
>
>
>
> 2013/6/7 Andrew Beekhof
>
> On 07/06/2013, at 2:52 AM, andreas graeper wrote:
>
On 11/06/2013, at 7:54 AM, Jeffrey Lewis wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> After installing heartbeat & pacemaker on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, I see the
> following in the /var/log/syslog. Any ideas? I have no resources
> configured at this point, so I'm not sure where to start.
Looks like you may have configu
On 11/06/2013, at 8:57 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 11.06.2013 13:26, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> This shouldn't be needed because of:
>>
>>https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/d13dc296
>
> Still have that with 8807e990c7caec633eaf2480d9633652
On 11/06/2013, at 10:33 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013, 14:58:30 schrieb Michael Furman:
> > Hi all!
> > We are trying to configure HA in Pacemaker 1.1.8 using
> > http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-plugin/html-single/Clusters_
> > from_Scratch/index.ht
On 11/06/2013, at 2:33 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I couldn't find a definitive source stating that
> a corosync/pacemaker/cman cluster must follow the
> rule: uname -n == node-name (== DNS-name of communication-IP)
In older versions this is true (an artefact of our heartbeat heritag
On 11/06/2013, at 3:25 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to get sure that I do understand it right:
>
> What do I find at
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/ha-clustering/RedHat_RHEL
> -6/x86_64/
>
> Am I right that I can't use this repository as source for a
> m
On 11/06/2013, at 1:32 AM, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> i found that uid.gid is hacluster.haclient but /var/log/cluster was owned by
> root.root.
> corosync refused to start, cause of missing write permission to log file !
>
> another question:
> i read in logs, that pacemaker plugin is no
On 10/06/2013, at 4:56 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (8807e990c7. the latest devel) with corosync-2.3.0.
>
> After this commit, start of pacemaker fails.
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/17237616a12e37e2c073b3bff7dded3d66bc8201
>
> I have not set no
On 08/06/2013, at 1:17 AM, ESWAR RAO wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> In our setup, we want the resources to start on the 2 nodes (active/active)
> so that the downtime would be less.
>
> All clients connect to the VIP. If the resource on any one node goes down, I
> expec
On 08/06/2013, at 6:49 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2013, 14:08:26 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> > On 06/06/2013, at 4:44 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was not satisfied with the situation
On 12/06/2013, at 12:08 AM, Andrew Martin wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Michael Furman"
>> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:19:52 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Can I use Pacemaker release 1.1.8 for production
>> clusters?
>>
>>
>>
>> Tha
This shouldn't be needed because of:
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/d13dc296
On 10/06/2013, at 9:46 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> This should make "warning: decode_transition_key: Bad UUID (crm_resource.c)
> in sscanf result (4) for 31980:0:0:crm_resource.c"
> go away.
>
>
On 11/06/2013, at 2:38 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all, hi Andrew,
>
> while having your package (pacemaker et. al.) set installed from
> http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-test-next/rhel-6/x86_64/
> to (hopefully) help debugging and testing, I mentioned
> the following.
>
> The man page of 'crm_res
On 11/06/2013, at 1:26 AM, Халезов Иван wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I would like to ask a few questions about the main road of the cluster stack
> evolution.
>
> 1) The RedHat company is planning to drop corosync support and wants to
> switch to CMAN.
> ( http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lis
On 07/06/2013, at 2:52 AM, andreas graeper wrote:
>
> thanks awfully for all your answers.
> i started reading about ha/cluster/drbd/pacemaker/.. two weeks ago. it is not
> yet easy to precise my questions.
>
> different os on test-environment only, but i already decided to have equal os
> f
ng for the RHEL 6.x build of pacemaker 1.1.10 I want to ask
> whether there can be done something for finding the memory leaks.
> If so, than explain the steps needed in detail. Currently there
> are two real clusters available to do testing.
>
> (Questions: Do you need logs? Debug-Lo
gt;
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013 04:26
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Release candidate: 1.1.10-rc3
>
>
> On 23/05/2013, at 12:33 PM, And
On 06/06/2013, at 4:44 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was not satisfied with the situation that the utilization of resources is
> static. This is not how real world resources behave. Especially virtual
> guests in a clustered environment show daily load patterns. So I thought i
On 23/05/2013, at 12:33 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Please keep the bug reports coming in. There is a good chances that
> this will be the final release candidate and 1.1.10 will be tagged on
> May 30th.
I am delaying rc4 until we can get definitive closure on the crmd memor
On 05/06/2013, at 12:15 PM, Denis Witt
wrote:
>
> Am 05.06.2013 um 04:04 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
>>>>> But no resources are started, so I suspect there really is quorum.
>>>>
>>>> Can you send me the output of cibadmin -Ql please?
>&g
On 05/06/2013, at 11:55 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
>
> Am 05.06.2013 um 03:34 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
>>> But no resources are started, so I suspect there really is quorum.
>>
>> Can you send me the output of cibadmin -Ql please?
>> Perhaps those two res
On 05/06/2013, at 10:43 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
>
> Am 05.06.2013 um 02:15 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
>>> Jun 5 01:11:06 test4 pengine: [18625]: WARN: cluster_status: We do not
>>> have quorum - fencing and resource management disabled
>>> Jun 5 01:
On 05/06/2013, at 9:22 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
>
> Am 05.06.2013 um 00:52 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
>>> been restored the resources aren't restarted. Running crm_resource -P
>>> brings anything up, but of course it would be nice if this happens
>>> a
On 04/06/2013, at 11:35 PM, Weihua JIANG wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want a typical active/passive mode HA solution.
>
> My Pacemaker configuration as below:
> 3 Nodes:
> node Lezbxh0jl
> node Ljn74rici
> node L472nxxdy (standby)
> The 3rd node L472nxxdy is only used for quorum election. So, I forc
On 05/06/2013, at 2:13 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have a cluster with two nodes running services, to make the Cluster
> more reliable I added a third node with no services (I didn't start
> pacemaker there, only corosync). I can't use STONITH in my setup so I
> choose no-quorum-pol
On 04/06/2013, at 3:00 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
> It is right movement that recognize other nodes in a UNCLEAN state in the
> node that rebooted, but seems to recognize it by mistake.
>
> It is like the problem of Pacemaker somehow or other.
> * There seems to be the problem wit
--ip 11.0.0.1 --choose Standby 500
Your stonith would be different though.
>
> Sincerely,
> Yuichi
>
> 2013/5/29 Yuichi SEINO :
>> 2013/5/29 Andrew Beekhof :
>>>
>>> On 28/05/2013, at 4:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>&g
On 30/05/2013, at 6:50 PM, "Alexandr A. Alexandrov" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So what is the correct scenario then?
> Editing CIB and removing 'monitor' operation altogether with making resource
> unmanaged?
As I wrote in my first reply:
>> A better approach would have been to disable the recurring m
.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Simon Platten
> ________
> From: Andrew Beekhof [and...@beekhof.net]
> Sent: 30 May 2013 08:10
> To: Administrator User
> Cc: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: Pacemaker and Angstrom
>
> On 30/05/2013, at 4:35 PM, Administrator User
ribution.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Simon Platten
>
> ____
> From: Andrew Beekhof [and...@beekhof.net]
> Sent: 30 May 2013 01:12
> To: Administrator User
> Cc: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: Pa
der order_ora inf: ms_oracle:promote oracle_fs:start lsnr orcl
> order order_ora_after_ip inf: IpGroup OraGroup
> order order_wcs inf: ms_wcs:promote wcs_fs:start wcs_imq wcs_wcsd wasd
> order order_wcs_after_ora inf: OraGroup WcsGroup
> order order_web_after_ora inf: OraGroup WebGroup
>
&g
On 30/05/2013, at 12:48 AM, Gopi Krishna B wrote:
> Hi, Thanks for the quick reply,
> Verified the steps and the /status works fine,
> Strangely, the pcs status shows as stopped but the apache process is running
> fine, and the dashboard (horizon) works.
>
> Is there any bug with the ocf reso
On 29/05/2013, at 4:51 PM, Benoît Capitanio wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I set up a cluster with two MySQL nodes.
> There is not only MySQL in the configuration.
>
> My problem is I would like to let MySQL up on the passive machine to perform
> a MySQL replication.
> But I don't know why MySQ
On 30/05/2013, at 6:38 AM, Simon Platten
wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
>
> I am trying to develop a HA application using the new beaglebone Black board
> which is based on an ARM Cortex A8 processor running Angstrom embedded Linux.
>
> I have downloaded the source code for Pacemaker-1.1, however I a
On 29/05/2013, at 6:19 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 29.05.2013 11:01, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 28/05/2013, at 4:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 28/05/2013, at 10:12 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>>>
On 28/05/2013, at 4:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 28/05/2013, at 10:12 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 27/05/2013, at 5:08 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 27.05.2013 04:20, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
On 28/05/2013, at 9:44 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've a two-node-cluster on a RHEL-clone (6.4, cman, pacemaker)
> and I'm facing a startup behaviour I can't explain and therefore
> hope, that you can enlight me.
>
> - 2 nodes: N1 N2
> - both nodes up
> - everything is fine
>
> Sta
On 28/05/2013, at 10:12 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 27/05/2013, at 5:08 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 27.05.2013 04:20, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2013/5/24 Vladislav Bogdanov :
>>>> 24.05.2013 06:34, Andrew Beekhof wr
On 27/05/2013, at 5:08 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 27.05.2013 04:20, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2013/5/24 Vladislav Bogdanov :
>>> 24.05.2013 06:34, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>> Any help figuring out where the leaks might be would be very much
On 25/05/2013, at 2:15 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 11:24 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Was there not a time where corosync was a subset of OpenAIS? Namely,
>> openais support for active/active and passive/active? I might have my
>> channels mixed up, it's been a while
>>
>> @#linux-clust
On 24/05/2013, at 4:35 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 24.05.2013, 01:39, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 24/05/2013, at 3:49 AM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> 23.05.2013, 02:51, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>>> On 22/05/2013, at 10:25 PM, Gr
n tmpfs repeatedly.
>> It seems to move well for the moment.
>>
>> I confirm movement a little more, and we are going to try the method that
>> Mr. Vladislav synchronizes.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Hideo Yamauchi.
>>
>> --- On Wed, 2013/5/
On 24/05/2013, at 2:19 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 23/05/2013, at 4:44 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c3486a4a8d. the latest devel).
>> After fencing caused by split-brain failed 11 times, S_POLICY_ENGINE sta
On 23/05/2013, at 4:44 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c3486a4a8d. the latest devel).
> After fencing caused by split-brain failed 11 times, S_POLICY_ENGINE state is
> kept even if I recover split-brain.
Odd, I get:
May 24 00:17:08 corosync-host-1 crmd[3056]: n
Any help figuring out where the leaks might be would be very much appreciated :)
Also, the measurements are in pages... could you run "getconf PAGESIZE" and let
us know the result?
I'm guessing 4096 bytes.
On 23/05/2013, at 5:47 PM, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I retry the test after we upda
On 23/05/2013, at 8:52 PM, Alexandr A. Alexandrov wrote:
> Hi, All!
>
> On one of my clusters I have resources groups, second group depends on first
> resource in the first group. Today I needed to restart one service from the
> first group (no dependancies other than group), so I made in unm
On 24/05/2013, at 2:43 AM, Andrew Widdersheim wrote:
> After setting the crmd-transition-delay to 2 * my ping monitor interval the
> issues I was seeing before in testing have not re-occurred.
Even a couple of seconds should be plenty.
The dampen value gets them almost arriving at the same ti
On 24/05/2013, at 7:35 AM, Lindsay Todd wrote:
> Working on this problem further...
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:14 PM, David Vossel wrote:
>> I'd suggest this. Try running the pacemaker_remote regression test and see
>> what happens. This will start up
>> an instance of pacemaker_remote l
On 24/05/2013, at 3:49 AM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 23.05.2013, 02:51, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 22/05/2013, at 10:25 PM, Groshev Andrey wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I try build cluster with 2 nodes + one quorum node (w
On 23/05/2013, at 9:47 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 13-05-22 07:05 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> Also, 1.1.8-7 was not tested with the plugin _at_all_ (and neither will
>> future RHEL builds).
>
> Was 1.1.7-* in EL 6.3 tested with the plugin?
No. Which is
no mentioning of rc3.
> It seems that there is no rc3 tag available:
> $ git tag -l | grep Pacemaker | sort -Vr | grep rc
> Pacemaker-1.1.10-rc2
> Pacemaker-1.1.10-rc1
>
> gr.
> Johan
>
>
> On 23-05-13 04:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Announcing the third relea
On 23/05/2013, at 4:44 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c3486a4a8d. the latest devel).
> After fencing caused by split-brain failed 11 times, S_POLICY_ENGINE state is
> kept even if I recover split-brain.
Well thats annoying, I'll have a look in the morning.
>
>
.
>
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 22/05/2013, at 7:31 PM, John McCabe wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've been trying to get fence_rhevm (fence-agents-3.1.5-25.el6_4.2.x86_64)
> > working within pacemaker (pacemaker-1.1.8-7
On 17/05/2013, at 12:23 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Using Pacemaker 1.1.8 on EL6.4 with the pacemaker plugin, I'm finding
> strange behavior with "stonith-admin -B node2". It seems to shut the
> node down but not start it back up and ends up reporting a timer
> expired:
>
> # stonith_admin -
On 17/05/2013, at 1:15 PM, Andrew Widdersheim wrote:
> I'm attaching 3 patches I made fairly quickly to fix the installation issues
> and also an issue I noticed with the ping ocf from the latest pacemaker.
>
> One is for cluster-glue to prevent lrmd from building and later installing.
> May
Announcing the third release candidate for Pacemaker 1.1.10
This RC is a result of work in several problem areas reported by users, some of
which date back to 1.1.8:
* manual fencing confirmations
* potential problems reported by Coverity
* the way anonymous clones are displayed
* handling of r
On 22/05/2013, at 9:44 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Using pacemaker 1.1.8-7 on EL6, I got the following series of events
> trying to shut down pacemaker and then corosync. The corosync shutdown
> (service corosync stop) ended up spinning/hanging indefinitely (~7hrs
> now). The events, includi
On 22/05/2013, at 10:25 PM, Groshev Andrey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try build cluster with 2 nodes + one quorum node (without pacemaker).
This is the root of your problem.
Your config has:
> service {
> name: pacemaker
> ver: 1
> }
So even though you thought you only started co
On 23/05/2013, at 1:04 AM, Халезов Иван wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I decided to update my pacemaker installation to the lastest version in
> CentOS 6.4 repository.
>
> For some reasons we need to use corosync 2.3 in our system. So i had to
> rebuilt pacemaker with corosync 2.3 support. I t
On 22/05/2013, at 7:31 PM, John McCabe wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying to get fence_rhevm (fence-agents-3.1.5-25.el6_4.2.x86_64)
> working within pacemaker (pacemaker-1.1.8-7.el6.x86_64) but am unable to get
> it to work as intended, using fence_rhevm on the command line works as
> expected,
On 17/05/2013, at 4:17 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> P.S. Andrew, is this patch ok to apply?
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/c7e10c6 :)
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinf
> from clusterlabs.org repo to pacemaker 1.1.9-2.
> I again got the same issue with pacemaker 1.1.9-2 and then I posted it in
> subscribe list.
Fixed in:
+ Andrew Beekhof (11 minutes ago) 3b75ba8: Log: Fencing: Indicate who initiated
fencing actions, not just the node name (HEAD, mas
On 22/05/2013, at 2:14 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:15:56AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof babbled thus:
>> cpg_join() is returning CS_ERR_TRY_AGAIN here.
>>
>> Jan: Any idea why this might happen? Thats a fair time to be blocked for.
>
> Looks li
On 20/05/2013, at 8:51 AM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> On 2013-05-17 22:07, Jake Smith wrote:
>>> primitive p_ip_service_ns ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
>>> params ip="192.168.114.17" cidr_netmask="24" nic="eth0" \
>>> clusterip_hash="sourceip-sourceport"
>>
>> netmask should be 32 if that's supp
On 21/05/2013, at 1:39 AM, Andrew Widdersheim wrote:
> Have I just run into a shortcoming with pacemaker?
Short answer: yes but there is a work-around
Basically attrd should be but is not truly atomic.
Despite its best efforts, updates can still arrive at sufficiently different
times to produ
On 21/05/2013, at 7:45 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
> I'm attempting to set up a test cluster consisting of two VMs on CentOS
> 6.4, but have run up against a wall with this fairly simple config.
>
> ### start output ###
> # service corosync start
> Starting Corosync Cluster Engine (corosync):
On 20/05/2013, at 3:00 PM, Староверов Никита Александрович
wrote:
>> Well, thats not nothing, but it certainly doesn't look right either.
>> I will investigate. Which version is this?
>
> I've tried this with pacemaker 1.1.8 from CentOS 6.4 repos, and then update
> from clusterlabs.org repo
On 16/05/2013, at 9:31 PM, Халезов Иван wrote:
> On 16.05.2013 07:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 15/05/2013, at 9:53 PM, Халезов Иван wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone!
>>>
>>> Some problems occured with synchronisation CIB configuration to disk.
>
On 17/05/2013, at 6:22 PM, Староверов Никита Александрович
wrote:
> Hello, pacemaker users and developers.
>
> First, many thanks to clusterlabs.org for their software, Pacemaker helps us
> very much!
>
> I am testing cluster configuration based on Pacemaker+CMAN. I configured
> fencing as
1101 - 1200 of 4430 matches
Mail list logo
