[1498] pcmk1 crmd: info: process_lrm_event:
LRM operation drbd_pg:0_notify_0 (call=28, rc=0, cib-update=0,
confirmed=true) ok
Regards,
Michal Mistina
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:23 AM
To: The Pacemaker
Fixed!
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/28fa4c6
On 16/07/2013, at 11:11 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 16/07/2013, at 5:37 PM, Johan Huysmans johan.huysm...@inuits.be wrote:
Hi,
Attached is some more logging of the failed diff:
I hope this is sufficient
at 4:31 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 16/07/2013, at 11:03 PM, K Mehta kiranmehta1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a two node test cluster running with CMAN plugin. Fencing is not
configured.
Thats problem 1
I see that vsanqa7 sends a message to vsanqa8 to shutdown
On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp wrote:
(13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp
wrote:
(13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek
On 19/07/2013, at 4:37 AM, Matthew O'Connor m...@ecsorl.com wrote:
Hi! I'm trying to build a full pacemaker/corosync/libqb tree into a
directory other than /usr. Unfortunately the Pacemaker configure script
fails to properly validate the existence of libqb:
checking pkg-config is at least
On 19/07/2013, at 7:08 AM, Miles Lott ml...@gie.com wrote:
This is the part of our pacemaker config which sets up our primary/secondary
drbd resource as well as the stacked resource. Due to occasional load on the
server, the resource check will timeout, forcing a reboot of the node using
be very useful. Also the output of cibadmin -Ql
Thx.
Johan
On 15-07-13 03:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 11/07/2013, at 5:09 PM, Johan Huysmans johan.huysm...@inuits.be wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about the missing info, here it is:
OS: CentOS 6.4
CoroSync: 1.4.1-15
Pacemaker: 1.1.10-1.el6
, is there some configuration I can apply to change behaviour to ifdown?
My major fear is that some network failure could trigger the code path that
leads to the isolated node updating CIB, etc.
Thanks again,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net
On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp wrote:
(13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10.
When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes
On 17/07/2013, at 2:33 AM, Tero M term...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to set up network interface as resource so that Pacemaker
enables and disables it as needed? I have need to set up network
interface that has specific MAC address but IP address is determined
with dhcp.
If you
On 16/07/2013, at 11:03 PM, K Mehta kiranmehta1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a two node test cluster running with CMAN plugin. Fencing is not
configured.
Thats problem 1
I see that vsanqa7 sends a message to vsanqa8 to shutdown.
However, it is not clear why vsanqa7 takes this decision.
It
On 16/07/2013, at 11:59 PM, K Mehta kiranmehta1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Where can I find information about which versions of pacemaker, cman and
corosync are compatible with each other ?
I don't think such a document exists.
What distro are you using? The best option is usually to use
On 12/07/2013, at 10:49 PM, Howley, Tom tom.how...@hp.com wrote:
Hi,
pacemaker:1.1.6-2ubuntu3,
ouch
corosync:1.4.2-2, drbd8-utils 2:8.3.11-0ubuntu1
I have a three node setup, with two nodes running DRBD, resource-level
fencing enabled (‘resource-and-stonith’) and obviously stonith
When Pacemaker is used with cman, Pacemaker provides the fencing capabilities.
So at the point Pacemaker is stopped, fencing is impossible.
This makes it unsafe for cman (which initiates fencing for its own reasons) to
continue running.
Also, CMAN's fenced is not very good at shutting down
On 11/07/2013, at 5:09 PM, Johan Huysmans johan.huysm...@inuits.be wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about the missing info, here it is:
OS: CentOS 6.4
CoroSync: 1.4.1-15
Pacemaker: 1.1.10-1.el6-3463b39 (rc6)
Any more info needed to investigate this error?
Could you set
On 13/07/2013, at 10:05 PM, Mistina Michal michal.mist...@virte.sk wrote:
Hi,
Does somebody know how to set up fence_vmware_soap correctly so that it will
start fencing vmware machine in the esx 5.1?
My problem is the fence_vmware_soap resource agent for stonith timed out.
Don’t know
On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10.
When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not
sometimes fenced.
Is this the assumed behavior?
Yes.
Sometimes the dev1 respawns the processes fast
On 11/07/2013, at 12:21 AM, Johan Huysmans johan.huysm...@inuits.be wrote:
Hi All,
I have a setup with a cloned resource and a resource group.
I also configured some colocation and order rules in such way that the group
can only run where the cloned resource is running.
On a 2 node
On 10/07/2013, at 11:32 PM, Andrew Morgan andrewjamesmor...@gmail.com wrote:
When I look at the log files, I see that there's an attempt to fence drbd1
even though I have nvpair id=cib-bootstrap-options-stonith-enabled
name=stonith-enabled value=false/ in the CIB. Why would the cluster
On 09/07/2013, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Morgan andrewjamesmor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 July 2013 04:11, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 08/07/2013, at 11:35 PM, Andrew Morgan andrewjamesmor...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Florian.
The problem I have is that I'd like to define
On 09/07/2013, at 3:29 PM, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I compiled pacemaker using the following commands
git clone git://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker.git
cd pacemaker
make rpm-dep
make rpm
But the acls are not enable by default?
no
Thanks
2013/7/9
On 09/07/2013, at 4:58 PM, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Andrew
please, can you tell me why?
Because its easy to turn on for anyone that wants it
Thanks
2013/7/9 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
On 09/07/2013, at 3:29 PM, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com
On 09/07/2013, at 10:29 PM, Martin Gazak martin.ga...@microstep-mis.sk wrote:
Dňa 7/9/2013 12:56 PM Andrew Beekhof wrote / napísal(a):
On 09/07/2013, at 8:49 PM, Martin Gazak martin.ga...@microstep-mis.sk
wrote:
Dňa 7/9/2013 12:42 PM Andrew Beekhof wrote / napísal(a):
On 09/07/2013
On 08/07/2013, at 5:57 PM, Andreas Mock andreas.m...@web.de wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I'm taking the builds from
http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-test-next/rhel-6/x86_64/
to avoid compiling on my own.
Do these build relate to the release candidates you're announcing?
Not at all, those are whatever I
programmers.
Best regards
Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Juli 2013 05:27
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Full API description for Fence Agent
On 04/07/2013, at 9:52
On 09/07/2013, at 12:50 AM, Andreas Mock andreas.m...@web.de wrote:
Hi all,
thank you for your recommendations.
I just hoped that there is something pacemaker internal,
e.g. like sending traps via snmp or something like that.
This is something crm_mon can now send traps, emails or call
On 08/07/2013, at 11:35 PM, Andrew Morgan andrewjamesmor...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Florian.
The problem I have is that I'd like to define a HA configuration that isn't
dependent on a specific set of fencing hardware (or any fencing hardware at
all for that matter) and as the stack has
On 06/07/2013, at 1:28 AM, Andrii Moiseiev amoise...@gmail.com wrote:
Any clues?
Not with only fragments of the logs
Do you have a log file (not syslog) configured? I'll need that complete file
If you could also set PCMK_trace_function=apply_xml_diff (see
Can you include a crm_report for your test scenario?
a) I need the pe files, but also b) parsing line wrapped logs is seriously
painful
On 05/07/2013, at 7:09 PM, Martin Gazak martin.ga...@microstep-mis.sk wrote:
Hello,
we are facing the problem with the simple (I hope) cluster configuration
On 03/07/2013, at 5:47 PM, Cédric VERKLEEREN cedric.verklee...@crelan.be
wrote:
Hi,
I am using Pacemaker 1.1.7 with Corosync 1.4.1.
After simulating an apache resource failure, the failcount increase.
Using the command crm resource failcount rsc show node for this clone
resource show me
On 19/06/2013, at 3:03 AM, andreas graeper agrae...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi,
i stopped n1 (drbd:master + all managed resources)
the n2 became drbd:master but all resources stopped.
i started n1.corosync again and stopped once more and than n2 took over
everything as expected.
in
On 04/07/2013, at 9:55 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
04.07.2013 14:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 04/07/2013, at 7:24 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi,
I think about safest way to expanding the cluster, and my observations
show that new nodes
filtering is done?
There is no filtering.
Best regards
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2013 13:41
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Full API description
On 06/07/2013, at 1:22 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Andrew might know the trick. In theory, putting your agent into the /usr/sbin
or /sbin directory (where ever the other agents are)
Yep. As long as its there, executable and takes arguments via stdin...
should just work. You're sure
On 05/07/2013, at 5:34 PM, Andreas Mock andreas.m...@web.de wrote:
Hi all,
I just wrote a stonith agent which IMHO implements the
API spec found at https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/FenceAgentAPI.
But it seems it has a problem when used as pacemaker stonith device.
What has to be
On 04/07/2013, at 8:37 PM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 04.07.2013 um 12:02 schrieb andreas graeper agrae...@googlemail.com:
i tried to change the IPaddr2 parameter ip
1) crm resource edit rsc
2) pcs resource update rsc attr=value
in both cases the cib is
On 04/07/2013, at 7:24 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi,
I think about safest way to expanding the cluster, and my observations
show that new nodes are always added in the online state
(standby=off). I would like nodes to appear in standby=on state
unless they can be
On 02/07/2013, at 7:32 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-07-02T10:46:09, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Our problem is that if i give crm resource stop vm1 and immediatly after
crm resource stop vm2
it happens that pacemaker begins to stop vm2 only after vm1
On 02/07/2013, at 7:54 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-07-02T08:25:18, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
if (cli_config_update(cib_copy, NULL, FALSE) == FALSE) {
Also, change FALSE - TRUE here so that you see the validation errors.
OK.
What could cause
On 02/07/2013, at 8:20 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-07-02T20:12:08, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
It seems related to the number of times I poll the CIB, too; I seem to
hit a transient window there, maybe. Since I dropped the number of polls
(instead
I wouldn't be doing anything without corosync2 and its option that requires all
nodes to be online before quorum is granted.
Otherwise I can imagine ways that the old master might try to promote itself.
On 02/07/2013, at 7:18 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com wrote:
Am Dienstag,
On 21/06/2013, at 11:36 PM, andreas graeper agrae...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi,
n1 active node is started and everything works fine, but after reboot n2
drbd is not started by pacemaker.
Are you sure?
I see a couple of start operations:
Jun 21 15:10:29 [5093] n2 lrmd:debug:
On 30/06/2013, at 10:09 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
Hi,
sbd connects to the CIB and watches updates come in to see if pacemaker
considers the node healthy still, and if the cluster partition is
quorate according to the CIB. That's all working fine.
But I've noticed that
On 01/07/2013, at 5:32 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
29.06.2013 02:22, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 29/06/2013, at 12:22 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote
On 01/07/2013, at 5:17 PM, Florian Crouzat gen...@floriancrouzat.net wrote:
Le 29/06/2013 01:22, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On 29/06/2013, at 12:22 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l
On 30/06/2013, at 4:48 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-29T09:22:20, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
This doesn't help people who have dual power rails/PDUs for power
redundancy.
I'm yet to be convinced that having two PDUs is helping those people
On 28/06/2013, at 10:48 PM, Sartoratti Lorenzo
lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it wrote:
Hi
Il 06/28/2013 12:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof ha scritto:
On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti
lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it wrote:
Hi,
we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite
On 01/07/2013, at 9:53 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-07-01T21:37:38, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
And apparently, this is one of the scenarios for which fence topology
was created and supports multiple devices per level. I'd venture the
opinion
On 01/07/2013, at 10:06 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
01.07.2013 14:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 01/07/2013, at 9:45 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
01.07.2013 14:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
I'm yet to be convinced that having two PDUs
On 02/07/2013, at 12:12 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-07-01T14:15:01, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
Reproducible on the non-DC node during full start-up of a cluster, yes.
And it turns out to be a CIB problem afterall. Or I'm doing something
else wrong:
On 02/07/2013, at 2:13 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Yes, but people around here also tend to be quite vocal when they think
something is missing.
More so if its something critical.
digimer whistles innocently...
I mean more than you, Jake and Vladislav.
That's not quite a party
On 01/07/2013, at 10:19 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
01.07.2013 15:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
And if people start using it, then we might look at simplifying it.
May be it's worth to have anonymous poll at clusterlabs.org for that?
I'll try and put one up today
On 01/07/2013, at 10:28 PM, Andreas Mock andreas.m...@web.de wrote:
Hi all,
just want to get clear about startup fencing.
Scenario: RHEL 6.4, cman, 2-node-cluster, pacemaker,
fence via pcmk-redirect. pacemaker stonith enabled,
no-quorum-policy=ignore, CMAN_QUORUM_TIMEOUT=0
When
On 02/07/2013, at 8:51 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 01/07/2013, at 10:19 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
01.07.2013 15:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
And if people start using it, then we might look at simplifying it.
May be it's worth to have
Apparently CC'ing the list on my replies was too subtle... can you please sign
up to and reply to the mailing list?
I don't do private support.
On 28/06/2013, at 10:48 PM, Sartoratti Lorenzo
lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it wrote:
Our problem is that if i give crm resource stop vm1 and
On 02/07/2013, at 12:12 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-07-01T14:15:01, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
Reproducible on the non-DC node during full start-up of a cluster, yes.
And it turns out to be a CIB problem afterall. Or I'm doing something
else wrong:
Is How important is the ability to use redundant PDUs for fencing? better?
On 02/07/2013, at 3:30 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
02.07.2013 03:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 02/07/2013, at 8:51 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 01/07/2013, at 10:19 PM
On 28/06/2013, at 5:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-28T11:11:00, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Maybe you're right, maybe I should stop fighting it and go with the
firefox approach.
That certainly seemed to piss a lot of people off though...
If there's
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01 pcmk_reboot_action=off port=1
pcmk_host_list=an-c03n01.alteeve.ca
primitive
On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it
wrote:
Hi,
we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite satisfied: thanks!
We have 30 virtual machines running in the cluster and maintained by
pacemaker.
When we stop the machines with crm, they are
On 28/06/2013, at 8:46 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-28T20:21:22, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
It looks correct, but not quite sane. ;-) That seems not to be
something you can address, though. I'm thinking that fencing topology
should be smart enough
On 28/06/2013, at 8:10 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 6:42 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra bcabe...@apsl.net wrote:
Hello Andrew,
El 27/06/13 14:44, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
You should see additional logs sent to /var/log/pacemaker.log
Finally yesterday
On 27/06/2013, at 10:46 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 25/06/2013, at 9:44 PM, Francesco Namuri f.nam...@credires.it wrote:
Can you attach /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-64.bz2 from SERVERNAME1 please?
I'll be able to see if its something we've already fixed.
Nope still
On 28/06/2013, at 8:59 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-28T18:41:35, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
There's an exception: dropping commonly used external interfaces (say,
ptest) needs to be announced a few releases in advance before enacted
upstream
On 28/06/2013, at 9:16 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 8:10 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 6:42 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra bcabe...@apsl.net wrote:
Hello Andrew,
El 27/06/13 14:44, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
You should
On 28/06/2013, at 11:37 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
I'm not sure there's a huge downside in it for you?
Ok, lets take attrd for example - which I've been wanted to rewrite to be
truly atomic for half a decade or more.
If it's rewritten in a way that doesn't affect
On 29/06/2013, at 12:22 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp
On 29/06/2013, at 12:36 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-28T10:20:56, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01 pcmk_reboot_action=off port=1
pcmk_host_list=an-c03n01.alteeve.ca
primitive
On 27/06/2013, at 8:20 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra bcabe...@apsl.net wrote:
¿Do you think it's a configuration problem?
No, more likely a bug. Which is concerning since I thought I had this
particular kind ironed out.
Could you set PCMK_trace_functions=crm_get_peer on selavi and repeat the
On 27/06/2013, at 5:40 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-27T14:28:19, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
I wouldn't say the 6 months between 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 was a particularly
aggressive release cycle.
For the amount of changes in there, I think yes
On 27/06/2013, at 1:53 AM, Denis Witt denis.w...@concepts-and-training.de
wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:33:30 +1000
Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
When you run ./autogen.sh it tries to start an rpm command, this
failed because I didn't had rpm installed.
How did it fail
On 27/06/2013, at 10:29 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra bcabe...@apsl.net wrote:
Hello,
Ohhh, sorry, but I have deleted node selavi and restarted, and now works
OK and I can't reproduce the bug :(
That is unfortunate
El 27/06/13 12:32, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
o, more likely a bug. Which
On 25/06/2013, at 9:44 PM, Francesco Namuri f.nam...@credires.it wrote:
Can you attach /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-64.bz2 from SERVERNAME1 please?
I'll be able to see if its something we've already fixed.
Nope still there. I will attempt to fix this tomorrow.
On 28/06/2013, at 12:52 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
Maybe you're right, maybe I should stop fighting it and go with the
firefox approach.
That certainly seemed to piss a lot of people off though...
If there's one message I've learned in 13 years of work on Linux HA,
then
On 27/06/2013, at 3:40 AM, andreas graeper agrae...@googlemail.com wrote:
thanks four your answer.
but still question open.
when i switch off the active node: though this is done reliable for me, the
still passive node wants to know for sure and will kill the (already dead)
former
On 27/06/2013, at 2:21 AM, Саша Александров shurr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Fencing is disabled for now, the issue is not with fencing: the question is -
why only one out of three DRBD master-slave sets is recognized by pacemaker,
Pacemaker knows nothing of drbd or any other kind of
Sent from a mobile device
On 26/06/2013, at 5:44 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:35:03 +1000
Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Urgh:
infoJun 25 13:40:10 lrmd_ipc_connect(913):0: Connecting to lrmd
trace Jun 25 13:40:10 pick_ipc_buffer(670
On 26/06/2013, at 12:24 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 06/25/2013 07:29 AM, andreas graeper wrote:
hi,
maybe again and again the same question, please excuse.
two nodes (n1 active / n2 passive) and `service corosync stop` on active.
does the node, that is going down, tells the
On 26/06/2013, at 6:51 PM, Denis Witt denis.w...@concepts-and-training.de
wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:35:33 +1000
Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
System is Debian Wheezy which means version 0.11.1-2 for libqb-dev.
rpm errors on debian?
I'm confused.
When you run
On 26/06/2013, at 7:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-25T20:28:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Perhaps a numbering scheme like the Linux kernel would fit better than a
stable/unstable branch distinction. Changes that deserve the unstable
term are really
On 26/06/2013, at 10:37 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-26T21:31:14, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Distributions can take care of them when they integrate them; basically
they'll trickle through until the whole stack the distributions ship
builds again
On 25/06/2013, at 4:34 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:10:13 +1000
Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 24/06/2013, at 9:31 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
After I have upgraded Pacemaker from 1.1.8 to 1.1.9 on a node I get
On 25/06/2013, at 5:56 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:50:14 +0300
Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
I would recommend qb 1.4.4. 1.4.3 had at least one nasty bug which
affects pacemaker.
Just tried that. It didn't help.
Can you turn on the
On 25/06/2013, at 6:32 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-25T10:16:58, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
Ok, I recently became engaged in the PСMK, so for me it is a surprize.
The more so in all the major linux distributions version 1.1.х.
Pacemaker has very
On 25/06/2013, at 5:37 PM, Francesco Namuri f.nam...@credires.it wrote:
Hi,
after an update to the new debian stable, from pacemaker 1.0.9.1 to
1.1.7 I'm getting some strange errors on syslog:
Thats a hell of a jump there.
Can you attach /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-64.bz2 from SERVERNAME1
On 24/06/2013, at 6:29 PM, Michael Furman michael_fur...@hotmail.com wrote:
Andrew,
I have send the core files attached to mail from Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013
13:18:04 +0300. Unfortunately the mail server did not sent it.
Can you look on the mail server?
100s of spam messages but nothing
On 22/06/2013, at 5:31 AM, Denis Witt denis.w...@cantbuyit.com wrote:
Hi List,
might be offtopic but I'm sure there are may People on this List who had
answered this question for themselfs.
I have a MySQL Master/Master/Slave setup which is rather unreliable, so i'm
asking myself if
On 24/06/2013, at 3:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the
final release.
Is it going to be 1.1.10 or 1.2.0 (2.0.0)?
First its going to be 1.1.10
On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO matsuo@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrew
2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO matsuo@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrew
I received similar error using 6ea4b7e(HEAD) under RHEL6
On 24/06/2013, at 8:55 PM, Munehiro SATO satoh-...@necst.nec.co.jp wrote:
Hi all,
Can resource agents know the cause of stop action?
Not really, no.
I want to know following situations in RA for my application(it's
Master/Slave resource).
* stop by crm resource stop
In this case,
On 24/06/2013, at 8:37 PM, andreas graeper agrae...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi,
crm_mon -rA1 shows :
ClusterIP(ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):Started lisel1
Master/Slave Set: ms_drbd_r0 [p_drbd_r0]
Masters: [ lisel1 ]
Slaves: [ lisel2 ]
p_lvm_r0(ocf::heartbeat:LVM):
On 25/06/2013, at 12:12 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO matsuo@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO matsuo@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrew
2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi
On 24/06/2013, at 7:45 PM, Michael Furman michael_fur...@hotmail.com wrote:
What kind of status?
We want to run one command that will return the status of the node in one
value: online or offline (or standby).
That could reasonably be added to crm_node.
On 24/06/2013, at 7:45 PM, Michael Furman michael_fur...@hotmail.com wrote:
What kind of status?
We want to run one command that will return the status of the node in one
value: online or offline (or standby).
Please find attached 3 core files.
I can't read the core files. They're
On 25/06/2013, at 1:20 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO matsuo@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 25/06/2013, at 12:12 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO matsuo@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO matsuo
On 25/06/2013, at 2:33 PM, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
25.06.2013, 04:46, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 24/06/2013, at 3:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1
On 22/06/2013, at 5:13 AM, Andreas Mock andreas.m...@web.de wrote:
Hi Andreas,
my two cents to your questions:
a) If you want to learn most, take any distro and compile the components from
source and afterwards use them. = Most learned.
Well, yes, but not always about clustering and
On 21/06/2013, at 5:38 PM, Thibaut Pouzet thibaut.pou...@lyra-network.com
wrote:
Le 20/06/2013 12:23, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On 20/06/2013, at 6:51 PM, Thibaut Pouzet thibaut.pou...@lyra-network.com
wrote:
Le 19/06/2013 23:57, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On 20/06/2013, at 1:57 AM
Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the final
release.
So just a reminder, we're particularly looking for feedback in the following
areas:
| plugin-based clusters, ACLs, the new –ban and –clear commands, and admin
actions
| (such as moving and stopping
(but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/heartbeat/attrd
/usr/lib64/heartbeat/cib
/usr/lib64/heartbeat/crmd
/usr/lib64/heartbeat/pengine
/usr/lib64/heartbeat/stonithd
/usr/sbin/crm_uuid
make: *** [rpm] Error 1
-
Regards,
Takatoshi MATSUO
2013/6/21 Andrew Beekhof
901 - 1000 of 3651 matches
Mail list logo
