p
Thanks for the help, Andrew.
On 10 July 2013 12:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 09/07/2013, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Morgan
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9 July 2013 04:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >
> > On 08/07/2013, at 11:35 PM, Andrew Morgan
&
On 9 July 2013 04:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 08/07/2013, at 11:35 PM, Andrew Morgan
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Florian.
> >
> > The problem I have is that I'd like to define a HA configuration that
> isn't dependent on a specific set of fencing har
specified will no
longer be able to host resources
Regards, Andrew.
On 8 July 2013 10:23, Florian Crouzat wrote:
> Le 08/07/2013 09:49, Andrew Morgan a écrit :
>
> I'm attempting to implement a 3 node cluster where only 2 nodes are
>> there to actually run the services and th
I'm attempting to implement a 3 node cluster where only 2 nodes are there
to actually run the services and the 3rd is there to form a quorum (so that
the cluster stays up when one of the 2 'workload' nodes fails).
To this end, I added a location avoids contraint so that the services
(including drb
