El 19/11/13 11:34, Lars Marowsky-Bree escribió:
On 2013-11-19T11:25:36, "Angel L. Mateo" wrote:
property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
dc-version="1.1.6-9971ebba4494012a93c03b40a2c58ec0eb60f50c" \
Wow, that's quite old.
It's pacemake
El 19/11/13 09:44, Lars Marowsky-Bree escribió:
On 2013-11-19T09:27:10, "Angel L. Mateo" wrote:
property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
dc-version="1.1.6-9971ebba4494012a93c03b40a2c58ec0eb60f50c" \
Wow, that's quite old.
It's pacemak
But my node was halted after the message:
Nov 16 12:20:47 myotis51 sbd: [1377]: WARN: Latency: No liveness for 4 s
exceeds threshold of 3 s (
healthy servants: 0)
Should I stop sbd daemon even if I have stonith-enabled=false?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de T
meta target-role="Started"
Where /dev/disk/by-id/wwn-0x6006016009702500a4227a04c6b0e211-part1 is
my disk device.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información
y las Comunicaciones Aplic
s is not a solution of course.
I also tested two separate stonith resources, one on each node. This
stonith'ing works fine with this configuration. Is there somehing
"wrong" about doing it this way?
Are you sure you have property stonith-enabled="true"?
--
El 27/05/13 09:28, Michael Schwartzkopff escribió:
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013, 09:19:41 schrieb Angel L. Mateo:
> Hello,
>
> I have configured a active/passive cluster for my dovecot server. Now I
> want to add to it a resource for running the backup service. I want this
>
El 27/05/13 09:28, Michael Schwartzkopff escribió:
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013, 09:19:41 schrieb Angel L. Mateo:
> Hello,
>
> I have configured a active/passive cluster for my dovecot server. Now I
> want to add to it a resource for running the backup service. I want this
>
ce is
move to another node, then it should be moved too; but it the backup
resource fails, then nothing has to be done with other resources.
Is it enough for this just disabling monitoring in the resource?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Informac
El 26/04/13 02:01, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
On 24/04/2013, at 10:48 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to configure a 2 node cluster in ubuntu with cman + corosync
+ pacemaker (the use of cman is because it is recommended at pacemaker
quickstart). In order to solv
m not sure about this.
What do you think?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA)
http://www.um.es/atica
Tfo: 868889150
Fax: 86337
___
Pacemaker mailing list:
(accesed via scsi fibre channel) and I don't want to use CLVM
(because I need lvm snapshots, not supported by clvm), so I need a
fencing device avoiding to concurrently use the same scsi devices in
both nodes.
Any idea on how to use fence_scsi? Or I could use any other
fence/sto
El 25/03/13 20:50, Jacek Konieczny escribió:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:01:28 +0100
"Angel L. Mateo" wrote:
quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
expected_votes: 2
two_node: 1
}
Corosync will then manage quorum for the two-node cluster and
Pacemaker
Jacek Konieczny escribió:
>On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:54:22 +0100
>> My problem is how to avoid split brain situation with this
>> configuration, without configuring a 3rd node. I have read about
>> quorum disks, external/sbd stonith plugin and other references, but
>> I'm too confused with a
n-quo.html
[2] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/78887
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA)
http://www.um.es/atica
Tfo: 868889150
Fax: 86337
# Please read the openais.conf.5 manual page
totem
dlm-pcmk: /usr/sbin/dlm_controld.pcmk
>
>
>2013/3/22 Angel L. Mateo
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to configure a cluster based in pacemaker and
>corosync
>> in two ubuntu precise servers. The cluster is for an active/standby
>> pop/imap se
d the use
of corosync instead of cman is because this is the one documented with
pacemaker
(http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-plugin/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/index.html).
Is it corosync supposed to be better (or more open or more standard
based) than cman? In case corosync
16 matches
Mail list logo
