Re: [Pacemaker] Location / Colocation constraints issue

f you want your script to act as drbd ms, look that one and do it an script agent 2013/12/22 Gaëtan Slongo gslo...@it-optics.com Hi ! Someone has any idea ?

Re: [Pacemaker] Location / Colocation constraints issue

Hi ! Someone has any idea ? Thanks ! Le 18/12/13 15:08, Gaëtan Slongo a écrit : Hi ! I'm currently building a 2 node cluster for firewalling. I would like to run a shorewall on both on the master and the Slave node. I tried many things but nothing works as expected. Shorewall

[Pacemaker] Location / Colocation constraints issue

Hi ! I'm currently building a 2 node cluster for firewalling. I would like to run a shorewall on both on the master and the Slave node. I tried many things but nothing works as expected. Shorewall configurations are good. What I want to do is to start shorewall standby on the other node as soon

Re: [Pacemaker] Why Pacemaker automatically creates constraints ?

remove this constraint, the resource migrates... What's your mind about that ? Thank you very much Le 05/12/13 18:18, Lars Marowsky-Bree a écrit : On 2013-12-05T17:12:01, Gaëtan Slongo gslo...@it-optics.com wrote: Hi ! I'm trying to configure a cluster using pacemaker 1.1 and corosync since

Re: [Pacemaker] Why Pacemaker automatically creates constraints ?

with -Q Which explain my problem in another words. I really need some help on this Thanks Le 06/12/13 09:39, Lars Marowsky-Bree a écrit : On 2013-12-06T09:00:32, Gaëtan Slongo gslo...@it-optics.com wrote: OK I understand, but this makes troubles for me... Example: When the node holding

[Pacemaker] Why Pacemaker automatically creates constraints ?

Hi ! I'm trying to configure a cluster using pacemaker 1.1 and corosync since 2 days (on Debian wheezy). Many of my current problems are related to the contraint creation. When I manually move a resource (or when a failback occurs) this kind of constraint is automatically created : location