ying >=dev-libs/glib-2.34. Have you tried this
already?
Regards,
Vlad.
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 08:45 -0800, Patrick Irvine wrote:
Hey Guys,
Just for the record, I just noticed this thread and it sounded familiar.
I checked my gentoo systems and I had to mask glib-2.32.4-r1 and use
glib
Hey Guys,
Just for the record, I just noticed this thread and it sounded familiar.
I checked my gentoo systems and I had to mask glib-2.32.4-r1 and use
glib-2.30.3 in order to get corosync/pacemaker to work. I had the same
problem. Nodes couldn't talk to each other. Sorry I didn't notice
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 12:03 AM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] order constraint based on any one of many
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Patrick Irvine wrote:
>
&
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 7:24 AM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] order constraint based on any one of many
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Patrick Irvine wrote:
> Hi Vis
not see how a clone
will run once a resource group is started . You can alternatively add
the clone to each group and ensure when either group starts , the
clone runs with it.
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Patrick Irvine wrote:
Hi,
I am setting up a Pacemaker/Corosync/Glusterfs HA cluster
Hi,
I am setting up a Pacemaker/Corosync/Glusterfs HA cluster set.
Pacemaker ver. 1.0.9.1
With Glusterfs I have 4 nodes serving replicated (RAID1) storage
back-ends and up to 5 servers mounting the store. With out getting into
the specifics of how Gluster works, simply put, as long as any on
