Re: [Pacemaker] [Question] About replacing in resource_set of the order limitation.

2014-02-16 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()? On 22 Jan 2014, at 3:05 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi All, My test seemed to include a mistake. It seems to be replaced by two limitation.

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question] About replacing in resource_set of the order limitation.

2014-02-16 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Thank you for comments. Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()? Yes. I think that a default is not handled well. I will not have any problem when sequential attribute is set in cib by

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question] About replacing in resource_set of the order limitation.

2014-02-16 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 17 Feb 2014, at 12:47 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Andrew, Thank you for comments. Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()? Yes. I think that a default is not handled

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question] About replacing in resource_set of the order limitation.

2014-02-16 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()? Yes. I think that a default is not handled well. I will not have any problem when sequential attribute is set in cib by all means.

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question] About replacing in resource_set of the order limitation.

2014-01-21 Thread renayama19661014
Hi All, My test seemed to include a mistake. It seems to be replaced by two limitation. However, I think that symmetircal=false is applied to all order limitation in this. (snip)       rsc_order id=rsc_order-clnPing-grpPg1 score=0 symmetrical=false         resource_set

[Pacemaker] [Question] About replacing in resource_set of the order limitation.

2014-01-16 Thread renayama19661014
Hi All, We confirm a function of resource_set. There were the resource of the group and the resource of the clone. (snip) Stack: corosync Current DC: srv01 (3232238180) - partition WITHOUT quorum Version: 1.1.10-f2d0cbc 1 Nodes configured 7 Resources configured Online: [ srv01 ] Resource