On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:47:29AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:02:01PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:02:01PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:07:05AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed,
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:29:43PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:47:29AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:02:01PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, May 5,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On 5/4/2011 at 08:49 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Tick tock. I'm going to push this soon unless someone raises an objection
RSN.
This is going into 1.1, right?
Right (after going into devel first). I'm
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:07:05AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:49:03PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:02:01PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:07:05AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Tick tock. I'm going to push this soon unless someone raises an objection RSN.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@novell.com wrote:
On 2011-04-13T08:37:12, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 5/4/2011 at 08:49 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Tick tock. I'm going to push this soon unless someone raises an objection
RSN.
This is going into 1.1, right?
Do existing CIBs automagically get updated to this syntax, or does the
admin have to force this? (Sorry, I
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:49:03PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Tick tock. I'm going to push this soon unless someone raises an objection
RSN.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@novell.com
On 2011-04-13T08:37:12, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Before:
rsc_colocation id=coloc-set score=INFINITY
resource_set id=coloc-set-0
resource_ref id=dummy2/
resource_ref id=dummy3/
/resource_set
resource_set
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@novell.com wrote:
On 2011-04-13T08:37:12, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Before:
rsc_colocation id=coloc-set score=INFINITY
resource_set id=coloc-set-0
resource_ref id=dummy2/
Here's an example of the before and after. Thoughts?
Before:
rsc_colocation id=coloc-set score=INFINITY
resource_set id=coloc-set-0
resource_ref id=dummy2/
resource_ref id=dummy3/
/resource_set
resource_set id=coloc-set-1 sequential=false
On 3/21/2011 at 08:20 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Small improvement to:
+ The only thing that matters is that in order for any member of a set
to be active, all the members of the previous set must also be active
(and naturally on the same node). When a set has
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/21/2011 at 08:20 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Small improvement to:
+ The only thing that matters is that in order for any member of a set
to be active, all the members of the previous set must
On 4/11/2011 at 09:37 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/21/2011 at 08:20 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Small improvement to:
+ The only thing that matters is that in order for
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On 4/11/2011 at 09:37 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/21/2011 at 08:20 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Small
On 4/11/2011 at 10:23 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On 4/11/2011 at 09:37 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On
Needs some updates.
+ Scores of all kinds are integral to how a cluster works.
well, not all clusters, just pacemaker ones.
How about:
+ Scores of all kinds are integral to how Pacemaker clusters work.
Assume the intent was to avoid confusion with actual sets here?
-
More simple changes for the Pacemaker Explained document. These are for
CH_Constraints.xml and consist of typos and small changes. It also includes a
change to Section 6.6 where dependency on preceding sets and preceding members
of sets are described as M=1 and N+1. These were just changed to
19 matches
Mail list logo
