this is a command "OCF_ROOT=/usr/lib/ocf /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/
pacemaker/controld meta-data" and print the agent meta-data
http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/STONITH
2015-02-12 13:02 GMT+01:00 José Luis Rodríguez Rodríguez :
> Hi,
>
> I have read the file /usr/lib/ocf /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/pacemak
Hi,
I have read the file /usr/lib/ocf /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/pacemaker/controld
and and it contains the same lines that you wrote. I don't know what I
must exactly do. Could you explain me the steps to do?
Must I do the variable OCF_ROOT. If so, where?
I don't know what to do when you say "yo
try to change your controld daemon
OCF_ROOT=/usr/lib/ocf /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/pacemaker/controld meta-data
The daemon to start - supports gfs_controld(.pcmk) and dlm_controld(.pcmk)
The daemon to start
and remember you need to configure the cluster fencing, because dlm relay on it
2015-
Hi Emmanuel, I installed this package but the result is the same when I try
to mount /dev/drbd1 on /mn:
gfs_controld join connect error: Connection refused
error mounting lockproto lock_dlm
I have installed *gfs2-tools*, *dlm-pcmk *y el que me indicastes* gfs-pcmk*
My *pacemaker configuratio
I'm using debian 7
apt-cache show gfs-pcmk
..
This package contains the GFS module for pacemaker.
...
2015-02-10 8:55 GMT+01:00 José Luis Rodríguez Rodríguez :
> Hello,
>
> I would like to create an active/active cluster by using pacemaker and
> corosync on Debian. I have followed the do
Hello,
I would like to create an active/active cluster by using pacemaker and
corosync on Debian. I have followed the documentation
http://clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf. It works well until
8.2.2 Create and Populate an GFS2 Partition. When I try to mount the disk
/dev/drbd1 as /m
Hi All,
I have a problem with creating active-active Apache cluster based on 2 VM
guests inside one KVM physical host.
My environment and configuration is:
1. VM1 : aa-node1 : 10.0.0.243 (eth0)
2. VM2: aa-node2 : 10.0.0.213 (eth0)
3. VIP: 10.0.0.210
4. KVM Host: host: 10.0.0.1 (virbr1)
I fo
On 09/19/2012 10:51 AM, ecfgijn wrote:
> Hi All ,
>
> I have configured active/active using pacemaker in centos-6.2 along with
> gfs2. Below are configuration.
>
> crm configure primitive ClusterIP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 params
> ip="169.144.106.121" cidr_netmask="26" op monitor interval=30s
> crm
Hi All ,
I have configured active/active using pacemaker in centos-6.2 along with
gfs2. Below are configuration.
crm configure primitive ClusterIP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 params
ip="169.144.106.121" cidr_netmask="26" op monitor interval=30s
crm configure primitive WebSite ocf:heartbeat:apache p
Nice documentation, thanx!
On 17/02/12 17:39, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
Hi there!
I wrote documentation about how to build an active-active LDAP cluster
using pacemaker over Debian Squeeze. In the examples I use a 2 nodes
cluster, but I've deployed it in a 3 nodes cluster with success. IP
Hi there!
I wrote documentation about how to build an active-active LDAP cluster
using pacemaker over Debian Squeeze. In the examples I use a 2 nodes
cluster, but I've deployed it in a 3 nodes cluster with success. IPv4
& IPv6
You can found the documentation here:
Part 1:
(isn't technical)
Part
Hi,
Ensure you have enabled multicast MAC addresses on your network equipment
(firewall, switch etc). Alternatively assign static multicast MAC to
cluster IP address on firewall.
Kind regards,
Brett
Sent from my mobile
On Nov 16, 2011 10:41 PM, "IVAN GARCIA" wrote:
> Hi Nick
>
> Yes I can ping o
Hi Nick
Yes I can ping only from the same subnet, if I try to ping from a diferent
subnet I can't reach the Virtual-IP.
I've tested witch cidr 20 24 and 32 with the same result.
I'ts strange.
2011/11/16 Nick Khamis
> Are you pinging from same network ip? Are you sure cidr is 20, and not 32
Are you pinging from same network ip? Are you sure cidr is 20, and not 32.
Nick.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:38 PM, IVAN GARCIA wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've changed the configuration and now it's seem I'm better, but now I've
> another issue
>
> Now both resources ClusterIP and Squid are running in
Hi there,
I've changed the configuration and now it's seem I'm better, but now I've
another issue
Now both resources ClusterIP and Squid are running in two nodes but I can't
reach ClusterIP.
Then if I get down ClusterIP in secondary node I reach well the ClusterIP.
Basically I can't have up 2 Cl
On 11/16/2011 10:10 AM, IVAN GARCIA wrote:
> Hi there,
> I'm configuring a cluster active-active for web proxy (SQUID), the proxy
> will be 4 nodes but now I only have 2 nodes, I've configured Virtual-IP
> with resource OCF:heartbeat:IPaddr2 and Squid in LSB resource mode, In
> active pasive all wo
Hi Andreas,
Have you seen anything strange? The configuration are ok?
Of course Andreas, I've tested from diferent clients.
Any suggestion?
Best regards
Ivan.-
2011/11/16 Andreas Kurz
> On 11/16/2011 10:10 AM, IVAN GARCIA wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > I'm configuring a cluster active-active fo
On 11/16/2011 10:10 AM, IVAN GARCIA wrote:
> Hi there,
> I'm configuring a cluster active-active for web proxy (SQUID), the proxy
> will be 4 nodes but now I only have 2 nodes, I've configured Virtual-IP
> with resource OCF:heartbeat:IPaddr2 and Squid in LSB resource mode, In
> active pasive all wo
Hi there,
I'm configuring a cluster active-active for web proxy (SQUID), the proxy
will be 4 nodes but now I only have 2 nodes, I've configured Virtual-IP
with resource OCF:heartbeat:IPaddr2 and Squid in LSB resource mode, In
active pasive all works fine but in active-active mode I don't know, why
On 10/28/11 12:08, Nick Morrison wrote:
Hello,
Noob question again.
I keep reading about people running primary/primary drbd pairs with Xen
on top to do live migration.
Can someone doing so please comment: is this setup safe? How do you
ensure that the two hosts don't both start the same guest
Hello,
Noob question again.
I keep reading about people running primary/primary drbd pairs with Xen on top
to do live migration.
Can someone doing so please comment: is this setup safe? How do you ensure that
the two hosts don't both start the same guest? Does you use an external locking
mech
> Hi there!
>
> I'm looking for some light regarding active/active firewall clustering with
> load balancing.
>
> I heard some references to ldirectord and LVS, but in the first's webpage (
> http://horms.net/projects/ldirectord/) there aren't any documentation, and
> in the LVS site (http://www.
Hi there!
I'm looking for some light regarding active/active firewall clustering with
load balancing.
I heard some references to ldirectord and LVS, but in the first's webpage (
http://horms.net/projects/ldirectord/) there aren't any documentation, and
in the LVS site (http://www.linuxvirtualserv
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> On Thursday 25 November 2010 08:56:21 Marko Potocnik wrote:
> (...)
> > The order constraint does not affect the IP migration strategy in case of
> > service failure. I agree that I missed it, but I does not affect the
> > current be
On Thursday 25 November 2010 08:56:21 Marko Potocnik wrote:
(...)
> The order constraint does not affect the IP migration strategy in case of
> service failure. I agree that I missed it, but I does not affect the
> current behavior of IP resource in case of service failure.
Perhaps it is better i
I mistyped. Actually I want the service to be controlled by pacemaker, the
service should run on both nodes (hot-standby, I achieved this using
clones), service should be restarted if it fails on any node, IP should move
if service on the same node fails. (and service should be restarted).
On Wed,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 10:21:04 Marko Potocnik wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 09:10:58 Marko Potocnik wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:10:58AM +0100, Marko Potocnik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am trying to configure a service (ftp for proof of concept) to run in
> an
> > active / active configuration. A floating IP is used to acces
--On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 10:21:04 AM +0100 Marko Potocnik
wrote:
> I'm using ftp just for test. I want a service to run on both nodes and
> only IP to move in case a service fails.
> I don't want to stop / start service if node fails.
You might be able to use the behavior of sshd as a hin
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 10:21:04 Marko Potocnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 09:10:58 Marko Potocnik wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I am trying to configure a service (ftp for proof of concept) t
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:10:58AM +0100, Marko Potocnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to configure a service (ftp for proof of concept) to run in an
> active / active configuration. A floating IP is used to access this service.
> What I am trying to achieve is that a floating IP would m
I'm using ftp just for test. I want a service to run on both nodes and only
IP to move in case a service fails.
I don't want to stop / start service if node fails.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 09:10:58 Marko Potocnik wrote:
> > Hi,
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 09:10:58 Marko Potocnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to configure a service (ftp for proof of concept) to run in an
> active / active configuration. A floating IP is used to access this
> service. What I am trying to achieve is that a floating IP would move to
> s
Hi,
I am trying to configure a service (ftp for proof of concept) to run in an
active / active configuration. A floating IP is used to access this service.
What I am trying to achieve is that a floating IP would move to second node,
if service fails on the first node. After that service should b
On 15.Oct 2010 13:26, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
On Friday 15 October 2010 09:47:50 Marcel Hauser wrote:
On 14.Oct 2010 22:31, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
i do know about fwbuilder and that it's possible to use fw builder in
order to build a cluster configuration. I've also read a pdf date
On Friday 15 October 2010 09:47:50 Marcel Hauser wrote:
> On 14.Oct 2010 22:31, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> >> i do know about fwbuilder and that it's possible to use fw builder in
> >> order to build a cluster configuration. I've also read a pdf dated in
> >> feb 2009 about ha firewalls by usin
On 15.Oct 2010 10:07, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
I didn't quick search and I couldn't find it, what is the name of the book?
search for "clusterbau" but it's written in german
marcel
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http:
On 15 October 2010 09:47, Marcel Hauser wrote:
>
> But that is no problem. firewalling is no hard job any more. A reasonable
>> machine can firewall 1 GBit/s traffic.
>>
>
> valid point. my only "concern" is/was that i don't like the idea of a
> passive firewall because when you need it to fa
On 14.Oct 2010 22:31, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
i do know about fwbuilder and that it's possible to use fw builder in
order to build a cluster configuration. I've also read a pdf dated in
feb 2009 about ha firewalls by using heartbeat.
Yes, I know I should update that paper ;-)
That would
On Thursday 14 October 2010 19:19:39 Marcel Hauser wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm very new to pacemaker... so please forgive me if i'm asking silly
> questions :-)
There are no silly questions, only silly answers. Or was it vice versa?
> I would like to build an HA Active-Active Firewall based on:
>
Hi All
I'm very new to pacemaker... so please forgive me if i'm asking silly
questions :-)
I would like to build an HA Active-Active Firewall based on:
- iptables
- conntrack-tools
- corosync
- pacemaker
i do know about fwbuilder and that it's possible to use fw builder in
order to build a
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Alan Rowe wrote:
> I'm looking for recommendation for this problem: I have an n-node cluster
> and in every one of the nodes, I want to know when membership changes (up or
> down).
>
> Obviously I can do this by polling.. but is there a better way?
>
> Maybe snmp
I'm looking for recommendation for this problem: I have an n-node cluster and
in every one of the nodes, I want to know when membership changes (up or down).
Obviously I can do this by polling.. but is there a better way?
Maybe snmp (but that section of the manual is empty)?
Maybe by having cloned
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 06:44:44PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we've configured several active/active two-node firewalls using
> pacemaker and clusterip (an iptables extension; we use Linux), with good
> results. We have several IP addresses on the firewall that we use f
Hi,
we've configured several active/active two-node firewalls using
pacemaker and clusterip (an iptables extension; we use Linux), with good
results. We have several IP addresses on the firewall that we use for NAT,
both inbound and outbound, present on both nodes. They load balance traffi
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:47:07AM -0500, David wrote:
> Got my first install of pacemaker/corosync running for a 2 node
> apache cluster in active/active mode yesterday on CentOS 5.5 x86_64.
>
> Everything was working just fine until I tested disaster recovery by
> failing both servers and r
Got my first install of pacemaker/corosync running for a 2 node apache
cluster in active/active mode yesterday on CentOS 5.5 x86_64.
Everything was working just fine until I tested disaster recovery by
failing both servers and restarting them.
When the servers came back I noticed that even th
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:11:10PM +0200, Tomas Kouba wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am running a simple information system that does not need to have
> a backend storage.
> I would like to run it in two instances on two nodes and have them in
> high available and load balancing setup. So the beha
Hello all,
I am running a simple information system that does not need to have
a backend storage.
I would like to run it in two instances on two nodes and have them in
high available and load balancing setup. So the behaviour would be
that both nodes share one IP address and requests are load bala
49 matches
Mail list logo
