matonb matonb@... writes:
The cluster has been up for about 15mins, still getting the same errors as an
unprivileged user on both nodes.
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
Are you sure you just didn't wait long enough for the cib to become active?
-bash-4.2$ id
uid=12(games) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),168(haclient)
-bash-4.2$ crm_mon -Af1
Last updated: Mon Mar 18 23:12:41 2013
Last change: Mon Mar 18 23:11:30 2013
Unprivileged but in the haclient group?
I'm out of the office at the moment, I'll verify that again tonight and get back
to you.
(I was testing on a different pair of nodes to my usual test cluster...).
___
Pacemaker mailing list:
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
Ok, managed to remote in.
On the node running the upstream version from CentOS:
-bash-4.1$ id
uid=26(postgres) gid=26(postgres) groups=26(postgres),499(haclient)
-bash-4.1$ crm_mon -Af1
Could not establish cib_ro connection: Permission denied (13)
Connection
Are you sure you just didn't wait long enough for the cib to become active?
-bash-4.2$ id
uid=12(games) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),168(haclient)
-bash-4.2$ /usr/sbin/cibadmin -Ql
cib crm_feature_set=3.0.7 validate-with=pacemaker-1.1
admin_epoch=1 epoch=22 num_updates=5 cib-last-written=Mon
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:52 PM, matonb mat...@ltresources.co.uk wrote:
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
I believe this should make everyone happy:
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/3c9275e
Are you able to test it?
I cloned the repo and used the pacemaker.spec.in file.
I did
Maxwell, Jamison [HDS] JMaxwell@... writes:
Pssh complained about wanting python-2.5, but I wasn't going to downgrade
from
2.6, so I skipped the
dependency. I've tested several areas within the shell and all appears
well...
crmsh (with pssh) from the SUSE ha repo works just fine, the
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
I believe this should make everyone happy:
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/3c9275e
Are you able to test it?
I cloned the repo and used the pacemaker.spec.in file.
I did have to tweak the spec file a bit to get it to build:
%global
Jamison Maxwell
Sr. Systems Administrator
HD Supply - Facilities Maintenance
-Original Message-
From: matonb [mailto:mat...@ltresources.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 8:30 AM
To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Cluster tools
Are you able
4:52 AM
To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Cluster tools
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
I believe this should make everyone happy:
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/3c9275e
Are you able to test it?
I cloned the repo and used the pacemaker.spec.in file
On 2013-03-15T10:05:30, Maxwell, Jamison [HDS] jmaxw...@pbp1.com wrote:
Is the HA community abandoning crmsh and why?
The HA community is NOT abandoning crmsh. crmsh remains supported by the
community, *and* on SLE HA. We are and will continue to develop it.
RHT has made a decision not to
] Cluster tools
On 2013-03-15T10:05:30, Maxwell, Jamison [HDS] jmaxw...@pbp1.com wrote:
Is the HA community abandoning crmsh and why?
The HA community is NOT abandoning crmsh. crmsh remains supported by the
community, *and* on SLE HA. We are and will continue to develop it.
RHT has made a decision
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:55 PM, matonb mat...@ltresources.co.uk wrote:
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:55 PM, matonb matonb@... wrote:
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
On Wed, Mar
AM
To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Cluster tools
Are you able to test it?
Happy to, have you rolled an RPM ?
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Am 14.03.2013 um 20:03 schrieb Maxwell, Jamison [HDS] jmaxw...@pbp1.com:
I was actually able to get the crm shell back onto a system
that I had upgraded unawares of the removal of the tool.
How bad an idea is that?
Pacemaker is currently listed as Tech Preview:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:55 PM, matonb mat...@ltresources.co.uk wrote:
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:59 AM, matonb matonb@... wrote:
Hi List,
I've just upgraded a CentOS 6.3 server to 6.4, other than the
disappearance
of the crm shell tools, one
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:55 PM, matonb matonb@... wrote:
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:59 AM, matonb matonb@... wrote:
Hi List,
I've just upgraded a CentOS 6.3 server to 6.4, other than the
disappearance
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:55 PM, matonb mat...@ltresources.co.uk wrote:
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:55 PM, matonb matonb@... wrote:
Andrew Beekhof andrew@... writes:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:59 AM, matonb matonb@... wrote:
Hi List,
I've just
Hi List,
I've just upgraded a CentOS 6.3 server to 6.4, other than the disappearance
of the crm shell tools, one thing I've noticed which is a minor annoyance
rather than a problem is that users which are members of the haclient group
can't use the crm tools any more:
$ crm_mon -Af1
On 2013-03-12T16:59:13, matonb mat...@ltresources.co.uk wrote:
Hi List,
I've just upgraded a CentOS 6.3 server to 6.4, other than the disappearance
of the crm shell tools, one thing I've noticed which is a minor annoyance
rather than a problem is that users which are members of the
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:59 AM, matonb mat...@ltresources.co.uk wrote:
Hi List,
I've just upgraded a CentOS 6.3 server to 6.4, other than the disappearance
of the crm shell tools, one thing I've noticed which is a minor annoyance
rather than a problem is that users which are members
21 matches
Mail list logo
