On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
James Oakley jf...@funktronics.ca wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2013 Stefan Botter
listrea...@jsj.dyndns.org wrote:
Hi Andrew,
...snip...
All of these replies make me hopeful that someone is going to answer
my question from the original message in
On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 Stefan Botter listrea...@jsj.dyndns.org wrote:
James, compare my configuration with yours.
Take a look especially on the location and colocation contraints.
What did you try in the meantime?
Start from bottom up, with a fresh configuration, and then add
resources
On Sunday, October 6, 2013 Stefan Botter listrea...@jsj.dyndns.org wrote:
Hi Andrew,
...snip...
All of these replies make me hopeful that someone is going to answer my
question from the original message in this thread. Sadly, it turned into
something unrelated.
--
James Oakley
Hi Dejan,
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 14:04:54 Stefan Botter wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Botter wrote:
I have a quite similar setup, currently running on stock 12.2. I
have a test system just updated to 12.3, with
On 06/10/2013, at 8:20 PM, Stefan Botter listrea...@jsj.dyndns.org wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 14:04:54 Stefan Botter wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Botter wrote:
I have a quite similar setup, currently
Hi James,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
James Oakley jf...@funktronics.ca wrote:
I don't know, but my configuration is - as said - almost similar,
but a
_lot_ shorter, due to usage of groups and thus far less contraints
and
location definitions. My nodes are virtual machines
- Original Message -
OK, but my primary intention was to give you a working example
configuration quite similar to yours, which you can compare. I
suspect,
that your constraints do not allow the slaves being activated.
I suggest you try to start with a smaller configuration without
Hi James,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:31:52 -0700
James Oakley jf...@funktronics.ca wrote:
I am having some trouble with DRBD Master/Slave resources in a 3-node
cluster.
I am using the Pacemaker packages from ha-clustering:Stable on
openSUSE 12.3. I was going to try the packages from Unstable
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Botter wrote:
Hi James,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:31:52 -0700
James Oakley jf...@funktronics.ca wrote:
I am having some trouble with DRBD Master/Slave resources in a 3-node
cluster.
I am using the Pacemaker packages from
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:57:12 +0200
Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Botter wrote:
I have a quite similar setup, currently running on stock 12.2. I
have a test system just updated to 12.3, with the
ha-clustering:Stable,
On Tuesday, October 1, 2013, Stefan Botter listrea...@jsj.dyndns.org wrote:
I have a quite similar setup, currently running on stock 12.2. I have
a test
system just updated to 12.3, with the ha-clustering:Stable, and it
fails
with STONITH enabled almost instantly, due to certain segfaults in
I am having some trouble with DRBD Master/Slave resources in a 3-node
cluster.
I am using the Pacemaker packages from ha-clustering:Stable on openSUSE
12.3. I was going to try the packages from Unstable to see if they work
better, but it seems the openais package is missing there.
So I have 3
On Monday, September 30, 2013 2:25:00 PM, emmanuel segura wrote:
Sorry maybe this is not the problem, but for avoid the split-brain
you need to configure fencing(stonith).
The last time I set up STONITH, I ended up with an instant
deathmatch on an otherwise stable cluster, and not a single
13 matches
Mail list logo
