the other should not wait that time.
>
> ** **
>
> Regards, Christian
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 05. Juli 2011 03:46
>
> *To:* The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> *Subject:* Re: [Pacem
egards, Christian
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net<mailto:and...@beekhof.net>]
Sent: Freitag, 01. Juli 2011 09:31
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Group not started/stopped in correct order with -INF
collocation
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:05
that
should be observed?
>
>
> Regards, Christian
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> *Sent:* Freitag, 01. Juli 2011 09:31
>
> *To:* The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> *Subject:* Re: [Pacemaker] Group not
Hello Andrew,
No, there are no ordering constraint between the groups!
Regards, Christian
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Freitag, 01. Juli 2011 09:31
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Group not started/stopped in correct order with -INF
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Kulovits Christian - OS ITSC <
christian.kulov...@austrian.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In a 2-node cluster two groups (prod, test) are defined with a collocation
> score=“-INFINITY“. When the node running the group prod failed, the test
> group on the other node
On 2011-05-31 16:04, Kulovits Christian - OS ITSC wrote:
> Sorry!! Yes, of course
>
> Corosync Cluster Engine, version '1.2.7' SVN revision '3008'
> CRM Version: 1.0.9 (da7075976b5ff0bee71074385f8fd02f296ec8a3)
> pacemaker 1.0.10-1.2.el5 - (none) x86_64
> corosync 1.2.7-1.1
: Mittwoch, 01. Juni 2011 10:21
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Group not started/stopped in correct order with -INF
collocation
On 2011-05-31 16:04, Kulovits Christian - OS ITSC wrote:
> Sorry!! Yes, of course
>
> Corosync Cluster Engine, version &#
On 2011-05-31 16:04, Kulovits Christian - OS ITSC wrote:
> Sorry!! Yes, of course
>
> Corosync Cluster Engine, version '1.2.7' SVN revision '3008'
> CRM Version: 1.0.9 (da7075976b5ff0bee71074385f8fd02f296ec8a3)
> pacemaker 1.0.10-1.2.el5 - (none) x86_64
> corosync 1.2.7-1.1
2
And it is a 4-node cluster...
Regards, Christian
-Original Message-
From: Florian Haas [mailto:florian.h...@linbit.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011 14:41
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Group not started/stopped in correct order with -INF
collocati
On 2011-05-31 14:05, Kulovits Christian - OS ITSC wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In a 2-node cluster two groups (prod, test) are defined with a
> collocation score=“-INFINITY“. When the node running the group prod
> failed, the test group on the other node was stopped and the prod group
> was started. After
Hello,
In a 2-node cluster two groups (prod, test) are defined with a collocation
score="-INFINITY". When the node running the group prod failed, the test group
on the other node was stopped and the prod group was started. After the failed
node was online again, the prod group was moved to the o
11 matches
Mail list logo
