Re: [Pacemaker] Location based on resource utilization

2011-10-25 Thread agutxi Agustin
2011/10/26 Andreas Kurz : > hello, > > On 10/25/2011 05:41 PM, agutxi Agustin wrote: >> Thank you Andreas! >> that's exactly what I was looking for :) >> I guess I was stuck with the documents from the older release. >> >> however, if you know the answer, I still would like to know (once I >> posed

Re: [Pacemaker] Location based on resource utilization

2011-10-25 Thread Andreas Kurz
hello, On 10/25/2011 05:41 PM, agutxi Agustin wrote: > Thank you Andreas! > that's exactly what I was looking for :) > I guess I was stuck with the documents from the older release. > > however, if you know the answer, I still would like to know (once I > posed myself the question, I'm curious) i

Re: [Pacemaker] Location based on resource utilization

2011-10-25 Thread agutxi Agustin
Thank you Andreas! that's exactly what I was looking for :) I guess I was stuck with the documents from the older release. however, if you know the answer, I still would like to know (once I posed myself the question, I'm curious) if it's a good practice to mess with the CRM from the resource agen

Re: [Pacemaker] Location based on resource utilization

2011-10-25 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 10/25/2011 01:36 AM, agutxi Agustin wrote: > Hi list, > I'm new to pacemaker (though I've fought my battles with former > heartbeat), so please don't go harsh on me ;D > I have read through all the documentation I found in the internet for > corosync/pacemaker/ras and have done and tested a few

[Pacemaker] Location based on resource utilization

2011-10-24 Thread agutxi Agustin
Hi list, I'm new to pacemaker (though I've fought my battles with former heartbeat), so please don't go harsh on me ;D I have read through all the documentation I found in the internet for corosync/pacemaker/ras and have done and tested a few lab scenarios to build up my knowledge, but in this case