On 2013-07-22T16:25:29, "\"Tomcsányi, Domonkos\"" wrote:
> You were right, the version in the Ubuntu repository is outdated, so I
> decided to install it from a PPA-repo. Now I have the latest version of
> everything, but naturally I already have an error:
>
> ERROR: running cibadmin -Ql: Could
2013.07.22. 12:16 keltezéssel, Lars Marowsky-Bree írta:
On 2013-07-22T12:09:22, "\"Tomcsányi, Domonkos\"" wrote:
crm(live)configure# colocation by_color inf: HTTPS_SERVICE_GROUP
OPENVPN_SERVICE_GROUP node-attribute=color
ERROR: 4: constraint by_color references a resource node-attribute=color
On 2013-07-22T12:09:22, "\"Tomcsányi, Domonkos\"" wrote:
> crm(live)configure# colocation by_color inf: HTTPS_SERVICE_GROUP
> OPENVPN_SERVICE_GROUP node-attribute=color
> ERROR: 4: constraint by_color references a resource node-attribute=color
> which doesn't exist
Which crmsh version are you us
2013.07.22. 11:15 keltezéssel, Lars Marowsky-Bree írta:
On 2013-07-19T23:18:29, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
You may use node attributes in colocation constraints.
Ohhh, good thinking. I had forgotten about that too.
But I wonder if that really is bi-directional; is the PE smart enough to
figure ou
On 2013-07-19T23:18:29, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> You may use node attributes in colocation constraints.
Ohhh, good thinking. I had forgotten about that too.
But I wonder if that really is bi-directional; is the PE smart enough to
figure out where resources need to go if one of them can't run on
2013.07.20. 17:32 keltezéssel, Lars Marowsky-Bree írta:
On 2013-07-19T16:49:21, "\"Tomcsányi, Domonkos\"" wrote:
Now the behaviour I would like to achieve:
If NODE 1 goes offline its services should get migrated to NODE 2 AND NODE
3's services should get migrated to NODE 4.
If NODE 3 goes offl
2013.07.22. 4:57 keltezéssel, Andrew Beekhof írta:
On 20/07/2013, at 7:18 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:49:21PM +0200, "Tomcsányi, Domonkos" wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have been struggling with this issue for quite some time so I
decided to ask you to see if maybe you ca
On 20/07/2013, at 7:18 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:49:21PM +0200, "Tomcsányi, Domonkos" wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I have been struggling with this issue for quite some time so I
>> decided to ask you to see if maybe you can shed some light on this
>> problem.
>>
On 2013-07-19T16:49:21, "\"Tomcsányi, Domonkos\"" wrote:
> Now the behaviour I would like to achieve:
> If NODE 1 goes offline its services should get migrated to NODE 2 AND NODE
> 3's services should get migrated to NODE 4.
> If NODE 3 goes offline its services should get migrated to NODE4 AND N
Hello everyone,
I have been struggling with this issue for quite some time so I decided
to ask you to see if maybe you can shed some light on this problem.
So here is the deal:
I have a 4-node cluster, from which 2-2 nodes belong together.
In ASCII art it would look like this:
--
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:49:21PM +0200, "Tomcsányi, Domonkos" wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have been struggling with this issue for quite some time so I
> decided to ask you to see if maybe you can shed some light on this
> problem.
> So here is the deal:
> I have a 4-node cluster, from which
11 matches
Mail list logo
