Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-state slave resource promoted when node was not quorate, expected?

2012-12-21 Thread Jesse Hathaway
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > No. That sounds like a bug. Can you attach a crm_report tarball to a > bugzilla entry please? Thanks Andrew, Bug reported created, please let me know if you need any other diagnostic information: https://developerbugs.linuxfoundation.o

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-state slave resource promoted when node was not quorate, expected?

2012-12-17 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Jesse Hathaway wrote: > We had a switch failure and all the nodes were partitioned. The slave node > promoted its resource while it did not have quorum. We have no-quourm-policy > set to freeze. Is it expected for resource promotion to occur when a node > does not

[Pacemaker] Multi-state slave resource promoted when node was not quorate, expected?

2012-12-17 Thread Jesse Hathaway
We had a switch failure and all the nodes were partitioned. The slave node promoted its resource while it did not have quorum. We have no-quourm-policy set to freeze. Is it expected for resource promotion to occur when a node does not have quorum? -- Jesse Hathaway, Systems Engineer Braintree