On 04/29/2010 12:15 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Gesendet: 27.04.2010 20:56:48
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Need an idea for dynamic configuration dependng
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Andreas Mock andreas.m...@web.de wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Gesendet: 27.04.2010 20:56:48
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Need an idea for
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com
Gesendet: 29.04.2010 09:06:44
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Need an idea for dynamic configuration dependng on
resource distribution
Hi Florian,
Are
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Gesendet: 27.04.2010 20:56:48
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Need an idea for dynamic configuration dependng on
resource distribution
configuration in the
Hi all,
I need an idea how I could achieve the following with corosync/pacemaker.
2 servers in a cluster. Each server is running a resource on its own by
pacemaker
configuration in the default case (everything o.k.). In this scenario the
resources
shall take as much server estate as possible.
Am Dienstag, 27. April 2010 14:45:21 schrieb Andreas Mock:
Hi all,
I need an idea how I could achieve the following with corosync/pacemaker.
2 servers in a cluster. Each server is running a resource on its own by
pacemaker configuration in the default case (everything o.k.). In this
scenario
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@multinet.de
Gesendet: 27.04.2010 14:51:58
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Need an idea for dynamic configuration dependng on
resource distribution
Am Dienstag, 27.