Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-10-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: > On 09/06/2012 07:41 AM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: >> >> On 09/05/2012 04:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wro

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-10 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
On 09/06/2012 07:41 AM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 04:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 20

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-05 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
On 09/05/2012 04:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: Hello,

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-05 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: > On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: Hello, Sorry If I send same question t

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-05 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: Hello, Sorry If I send same question twice, but message did not appeared on mailing list. I have a problem with orders in pac

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-05 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Sorry If I send same question twice, but message did not appeared on mailing > > list. > > > > I have a problem with orders in pacemaker 1.1.6 and corosync 1.4

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-04 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
On 09/04/2012 11:51 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: Hello, Sorry If I send same question twice, but message did not appeared on mailing list. I have a problem with orders in pacemaker 1.1.6 and corosync 1.4.1. Order below is working for failove

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry If I send same question twice, but message did not appeared on mailing > list. > > I have a problem with orders in pacemaker 1.1.6 and corosync 1.4.1. > > Order below is working for failover, but it is not working when one cl

[Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-02 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
Hello, Sorry If I send same question twice, but message did not appeared on mailing list. I have a problem with orders in pacemaker 1.1.6 and corosync 1.4.1. Order below is working for failover, but it is not working when one cluster node starts up (drbd stays in Slave state and ms_toponet i