: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.8 is out now
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:28 PM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR **
mohame...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to get/build pacemaker 1.1.8 rpms for RHEL5?
I think you'd be pushing it.
glib (and I think some other packages) on RHEL5 are really
: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:03 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.8 is out now
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:28 PM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR **
mohame...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
Hi
20.09.2012 13:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
This has been coming for a while now, the final hold-up was some
stonith interactions in the presence of multiple clients that while
strictly correct, wasn't really good enough.
1.1.8 seems to be in a very good shape. Didn't you think about making it
a
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
20.09.2012 13:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
This has been coming for a while now, the final hold-up was some
stonith interactions in the presence of multiple clients that while
strictly correct, wasn't really good
Hi,
Is it possible to get/build pacemaker 1.1.8 rpms for RHEL5?
Thanks,
Raffi
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:41 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.8 is out now
pacemaker will build.
if i get time in the next week I will have a go.
Thanks,
Raffi
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:41 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.8
Thanks Andrew :)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:03 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.8 is out now
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:28 PM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR
This has been coming for a while now, the final hold-up was some stonith
interactions in the presence of multiple clients that while strictly correct,
wasn't really good enough.
A big thankyou to all those that tested the pre-release versions and helped to
work out the kinks.
Fedora and EPEL
On 09/20/2012 12:25 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
This has been coming for a while now, the final hold-up was some stonith
interactions in the presence of multiple clients that while strictly correct,
wasn't really good enough.
A big thankyou to all those that tested the pre-release versions
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 09/20/2012 12:25 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
This has been coming for a while now, the final hold-up was some stonith
interactions in the presence of multiple clients that while strictly
correct, wasn't
10 matches
Mail list logo