Hi, Yan
(2011/12/13 19:29), Gao,Yan wrote:
So assign_to is NULL for the later call:
native_assign_node(rsc, NULL, assign_to, TRUE);
This means it is allocated to no node. That's why an "unmanaged failed"
resource would not consume the capacity of the node.
I understood it.
Many Thanks!!
Yuus
Hi Yuusuke,
On 12/13/11 16:34, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Yan
>
> (2011/10/31 20:50), Yuusuke Iida wrote:
>> I read a cord of pengine.
>> By all appearance, as for the resource becoming "unmanaged failed", an
>> allotment does not seem to be performed.
>> Is the recognition that an allotment is no
Hi, Yan
(2011/10/31 20:50), Yuusuke Iida wrote:
I read a cord of pengine.
By all appearance, as for the resource becoming "unmanaged failed", an
allotment does not seem to be performed.
Is the recognition that an allotment is not performed as for the
"unmanaged failed" resource that failed in st
Hi, Yan
I read a cord of pengine.
By all appearance, as for the resource becoming "unmanaged failed", an
allotment does not seem to be performed.
Is the recognition that an allotment is not performed as for the
"unmanaged failed" resource that failed in stop right?
Does it mean that capacity o
Yan, could you have a look into this one? Looks related to your
utilisation feaure.
2011/7/26 Yuusuke IIDA :
> Hi, Yan
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I used the function of placement-strategy and found movement to be worried
> about.
>
> There is node "act3" which the resource that became the unmanaged state
