with Pacemaker 1.1.8 on F17
You'd think that would help, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035 suggests
otherwise.
I have one remaining fedora machine where KVM clusters still work,
I
don't think I'll ever update it now.
Well, that was fascinating read
Howdy all,
I'm trying to run Pacemaker 1.1.8 (from
http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/fedora-17/clusterlabs.repo) in a
two-node configuration under Fedora 17. I'm running into a few
different problems.
I'm trying to create resources using the systemd: manager. If I run
pcs resource standards I
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@oddbit.com wrote:
Howdy all,
I'm trying to run Pacemaker 1.1.8 (from
http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/fedora-17/clusterlabs.repo) in a
two-node configuration under Fedora 17. I'm running into a few
different problems.
I'm trying to
Did you define a recurring monitor action?
You know, upon reflection, probably not. I started with op monitor
interval=10s, but because of all the problems I ran into with pcs
complaining about systemd: services I think I dropped everything except the
service name and agent in order to
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@oddbit.com wrote:
Did you define a recurring monitor action?
You know, upon reflection, probably not. I started with op monitor
interval=10s, but because of all the problems I ran into with pcs
complaining about systemd: services I
The switch is a standard Linux bridge device, and the two systems are KVM
virtual machines attached to the same bridge. Are there known problems
with this configuration? I' can't get corosync to stay up for more than a
few minutes. I would simply use a vrrp or carp solution, but I need a
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@oddbit.com wrote:
The switch is a standard Linux bridge device, and the two systems are KVM
virtual machines attached to the same bridge.
You'd think that would help, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035 suggests
You'd think that would help, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035 suggests otherwise.
I have one remaining fedora machine where KVM clusters still work, I
don't think I'll ever update it now.
Well, that was fascinating read.
Using the udpu transport seems to have
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@oddbit.com wrote:
You'd think that would help, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035 suggests otherwise.
I have one remaining fedora machine where KVM clusters still work, I
don't think I'll ever update it now.
