Hi Andrew,
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 2:28 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Cc: shimaza...@intellilink.co.jp
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question about recovery policy after Too many
failures
On 11/04/2013, at 7:23 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
(13.04.08 12:01), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 27/03/2013, at 7:45 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c7910371a5. the latest devel).
When fencing
On 11/04/2013, at 7:23 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
(13.04.08 12:01), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 27/03/2013, at 7:45 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c7910371a5. the latest devel).
When fencing
On 27/03/2013, at 7:45 PM, Kazunori INOUE inouek...@intellilink.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c7910371a5. the latest devel).
When fencing failed 10 times, S_TRANSITION_ENGINE state is kept.
(related: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/e29d2f9)
How should I
