Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-28 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 25/07/2013, at 7:03 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > (13.07.25 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On 24/07/2013, at 7:40 PM, Kazunori INOUE >> wrote: >> >>> (13.07.18 19:23), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > (13.07.16 21:18),

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-25 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.25 18:03), Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.25 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 24/07/2013, at 7:40 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.18 19:23), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM,

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-25 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.25 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 24/07/2013, at 7:40 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.18 19:23), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.15 11:00)

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 24/07/2013, at 7:40 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > (13.07.18 19:23), Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE >> wrote: >> >>> (13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > (13.07.15 11:00),

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-24 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.18 19:23), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I'm using p

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > (13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE >> wrote: >> >>> (13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not s

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-16 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > (13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. >>> When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not >>> sometimes f

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-16 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.12 22:48), emmanuel segura wrote: Hi try to disable selinux Though I tried it, the result did not change. +++ Jul 12 16:46:10 dev1 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/virsh from getattr access on the file

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-16 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not sometimes fenced. Is this the assumed behavior? Yes. Sometimes the dev1 respawns the process

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-14 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. > When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not > sometimes fenced. > Is this the assumed behavior? Yes. Sometimes the dev1 respawns the processes fast enough that dev2 gets th

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-12 Thread Digimer
On 12/07/13 04:28, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not sometimes fenced. Is this the assumed behavior? procedure: $ systemctl start pacemaker $ crm configure load update test.cli $ pkill -9 lrmd attac

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-12 Thread emmanuel segura
Hi try to disable selinux +++ Jul 12 16:46:10 dev1 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/virsh from getattr access on the file /usr/bin/ssh. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 3d5afba4-40a5-41ff-9530-3839da8a8c