o: Bob Schatz
>> Cc: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>> Sent: Thu, April 14, 2011 2:14:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question regarding starting of master/slave
>> resources and ELECTIONs
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Beekhof
>> w
Andrew,
Comments at end with
From: Andrew Beekhof
To: Bob Schatz
Cc: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Sent: Fri, April 15, 2011 4:28:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question regarding starting of master/slave resources
and ELECTIONs
On Fri, Apr 15
gt; Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question regarding starting of master/slave
> resources and ELECTIONs
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>>> I noticed that 4 of the master/slave resources will start right away but
>>>> the
>>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> I noticed that 4 of the master/slave resources will start right away but
>>> the
>>> 5 master/slave resource seems to take a minute or so and I am only running
>>> with one node.
>>> Is this expected?
>>
>> Probably, if the other 4 take
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question regarding starting of master/slave
> resources and ELECTIONs
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Bob Schatz wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am running Pacemaker 1.0.9 with Heartbeat 3.0.3.
>> I create 5 master/slave resources in /etc/ha.d/resource.
Andrew,
Thanks for responding. Comments inline with
From: Andrew Beekhof
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Cc: Bob Schatz
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 11:23:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question regarding starting of master/slave resources
and
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Bob Schatz wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running Pacemaker 1.0.9 with Heartbeat 3.0.3.
> I create 5 master/slave resources in /etc/ha.d/resource.d/startstop during
> post-start.
I had no idea this was possible. Why would you do this?
> I noticed that 4 of the master/slave
