On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
05.11.2012 09:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
But you can guess it, as admins usually name nodes the same way. If not
- that is problem of admins.
No, its the problem of developers that get yelled at by admins :)
05.11.2012 09:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
But you can guess it, as admins usually name nodes the same way. If not
- that is problem of admins.
No, its the problem of developers that get yelled at by admins :)
:)
Something says me this would provide better backwards
compatibility,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
01.11.2012 03:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
30.10.2012 04:27, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On reflection, I think making this configurable is
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
30.10.2012 04:27, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On reflection, I think making this configurable is going to cause more
trouble than its worth.
Any sysconfig mismatch between the nodes would result in major breakage.
We
01.11.2012 03:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
30.10.2012 04:27, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On reflection, I think making this configurable is going to cause more
trouble than its worth.
Any sysconfig mismatch between the
30.10.2012 04:27, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On reflection, I think making this configurable is going to cause more
trouble than its worth.
Any sysconfig mismatch between the nodes would result in major breakage.
We need to pick one way and make it the default - if people want/need
anything
On reflection, I think making this configurable is going to cause more
trouble than its worth.
Any sysconfig mismatch between the nodes would result in major breakage.
We need to pick one way and make it the default - if people want/need
anything else, they need to use the corosync node list.
For
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
26.10.2012 04:06, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
25.10.2012 07:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
26.10.2012 12:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
May be also set it forcibly to uname if uname contains full lexem found
in dns name?
Run that past me again?
I mean that if ip address resolves to fqdn, and that fqdn begins with
what uname call returns (so both node itself and DNS agree on a node
26.10.2012 13:38, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
26.10.2012 12:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
May be also set it forcibly to uname if uname contains full lexem found
in dns name?
Run that past me again?
I mean that if ip address resolves to fqdn, and that fqdn begins with
what uname call
On 2012-10-25T12:47:32, Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com wrote:
Does anyone out there have the capacity and interest to test betas of 2.0.0
if I release them?
If so, for what distro and version?
I guess this depends on what level of testing you are looking for.
We probably can take care
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2012-10-25T12:47:32, Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com wrote:
Does anyone out there have the capacity and interest to test betas of 2.0.0
if I release them?
If so, for what distro and version?
I guess this depends
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
25.10.2012 07:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
25.10.2012 04:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Does anyone out there have the capacity and interest
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 10/24/2012 09:47 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Does anyone out there have the capacity and interest to test betas of 2.0.0
if I release them?
If so, for what distro and version?
(Anyone looking for heartbeat to be supported in
26.10.2012 04:06, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
25.10.2012 07:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
25.10.2012 04:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Does anyone
Does anyone out there have the capacity and interest to test betas of 2.0.0 if
I release them?
If so, for what distro and version?
(Anyone looking for heartbeat to be supported in 2.0.0 would be highly
encouraged to put their hand up :-)
-- Andrew
On 10/24/2012 09:47 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Does anyone out there have the capacity and interest to test betas of 2.0.0
if I release them?
If so, for what distro and version?
(Anyone looking for heartbeat to be supported in 2.0.0 would be highly
encouraged to put their hand up :-)
--
25.10.2012 04:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Does anyone out there have the capacity and interest to test betas of 2.0.0
if I release them?
Sure.
If so, for what distro and version?
Git tag would be enough for me.
(Anyone looking for heartbeat to be supported in 2.0.0 would be highly
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
25.10.2012 04:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Does anyone out there have the capacity and interest to test betas of 2.0.0
if I release them?
Sure.
If so, for what distro and version?
Git tag would be enough for me.
19 matches
Mail list logo
