27.07.2011 05:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
>> * Dependent resources should not be stopped/started for 'reload' action.
>> Of course they are restarted if reload fails and stop/start is executed
>> then. (I see that they are restarted now for reload of a resource they
>> depend on, is it a bug?)
>
27.07.2011 05:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
>> * Dependent resources should not be stopped/started for 'reload' action.
>> Of course they are restarted if reload fails and stop/start is executed
>> then. (I see that they are restarted now for reload of a resource they
>> depend on, is it a bug?)
>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Would somebody (Andrew?) please bring some light on how exactly
> redefinition of resource is supposed to be handled?
>
> Below is my (rather perfectionistic) vision on this, please correct me
> if/where I'm wrong:
> * If RA
Hi all,
Would somebody (Andrew?) please bring some light on how exactly
redefinition of resource is supposed to be handled?
Below is my (rather perfectionistic) vision on this, please correct me
if/where I'm wrong:
* If RA supports 'reload' action then it is called on resource
definition change (
