Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju 2013/2/19 Jiaju Zhang : > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 18:26 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >> Hi, Jiaju >> >> Thank you for merging! >> >> BTW, is there any comment about the patent that I heard before? > > I don't think there are any patent related problems here. There are > quite a lot of open so

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 18:26 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > Thank you for merging! > > BTW, is there any comment about the patent that I heard before? I don't think there are any patent related problems here. There are quite a lot of open source projects which are based on Paxos or Pax

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju Thank you for merging! BTW, is there any comment about the patent that I heard before? Thanks, Yusuke 2013/2/18 Jiaju Zhang : > On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 14:12 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >> Hi, Jiaju >> >> It understood leaving processing of is_prepared(). >> I did "pull request" of judgme

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 14:12 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > It understood leaving processing of is_prepared(). > I did "pull request" of judgment processing. > Please confirm it. > > https://github.com/jjzhang/booth/pull/50 Pulled, thanks! Thanks, Jiaju _

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju It understood leaving processing of is_prepared(). I did "pull request" of judgment processing. Please confirm it. https://github.com/jjzhang/booth/pull/50 Regards, Yusuke 2013/2/18 Jiaju Zhang : > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:36 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >> Hi, Jiaju >> >> Thank you for

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 11:36 +0800, Jiaju Zhang wrote: > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:36 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > > Hi, Jiaju > > > > Thank you for reply! > > > > 2013/2/12 Jiaju Zhang : > > > Hi Yusuke, > > > > > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:08 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > > >> Hi, Jiaju > > >> > > >

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:36 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > Thank you for reply! > > 2013/2/12 Jiaju Zhang : > > Hi Yusuke, > > > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:08 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > >> Hi, Jiaju > >> > >> Could you please reply to this message? > > > > My suggestion is no need to

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju Thank you for reply! 2013/2/12 Jiaju Zhang : > Hi Yusuke, > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:08 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >> Hi, Jiaju >> >> Could you please reply to this message? > > My suggestion is no need to add additional configuration options, in > this case, the behavior of booth is d

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi Yusuke, On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:08 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > Could you please reply to this message? My suggestion is no need to add additional configuration options, in this case, the behavior of booth is definitive, return a negative value in lease_promise. That being said

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju Could you please reply to this message? Regards, Yusuke. 2013/1/28 yusuke iida : > Hi, Jiaju > > 2013/1/15 Jiaju Zhang : >> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:28 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >>> Hi, Jiaju >>> >>> 2013/1/11 Jiaju Zhang : >>> > Hi Yusuke, >>> > >>> > Sorry for the late reply;) >>> >

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju 2013/1/15 Jiaju Zhang : > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:28 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >> Hi, Jiaju >> >> 2013/1/11 Jiaju Zhang : >> > Hi Yusuke, >> > >> > Sorry for the late reply;) >> > >> > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 13:50 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >> >> Hi, Jiaju >> >> >> >> When the proposal wa

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:28 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > 2013/1/11 Jiaju Zhang : > > Hi Yusuke, > > > > Sorry for the late reply;) > > > > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 13:50 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > >> Hi, Jiaju > >> > >> When the proposal was conflict, I want to keep on the site of the >

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju 2013/1/11 Jiaju Zhang : > Hi Yusuke, > > Sorry for the late reply;) > > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 13:50 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >> Hi, Jiaju >> >> When the proposal was conflict, I want to keep on the site of the >> original lease. >> I do not want to generate a revoke when maintained. >>

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi Yusuke, Sorry for the late reply;) On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 13:50 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > When the proposal was conflict, I want to keep on the site of the > original lease. > I do not want to generate a revoke when maintained. > > > I made a patch according to a thought of "

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju When the proposal was conflict, I want to keep on the site of the original lease. I do not want to generate a revoke when maintained. I made a patch according to a thought of "5.2 Master lease" described in the next article. It means that it prevents you from accepting new suggestion u

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju Thanks for the reply. 2012/12/12 Jiaju Zhang : > This is what I wanted to do as well;) That is to say, the lease should > keep renewing on the original site successfully unless it was down. > Current implementation is to let the original site renew the ticket > before ticket lease expir

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi Yusuke, On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 21:30 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > > > When communication of a part of proposer and acceptor goes out, > re-acquisition of lease is temporarily performed by proposer. > > Since a ticket will be temporarily revoke(d) at this time, service > will sto

[Pacemaker] Suggestion to improve movement of booth

Hi, Jiaju When communication of a part of proposer and acceptor goes out, re-acquisition of lease is temporarily performed by proposer. Since a ticket will be temporarily revoke(d) at this time, service will stop temporarily. I think that this is a problem. I hope that lease of the ticket is held.