Hi,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:09:57PM +0530, Romi Verma wrote:
> actually after going through few previous posts i am kinda confused.
>
> In > 2 nodes cluster , if we configure a ilo stonith (which can control
> only one node at a time) for a particular node then
>
> 1) running it on only on
> on-fail=ignore ?
I will try it, but I cannot do that immediately.
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:23, Takenaka Kazuhiro
wrote:
Hello
It is completely dependent on your stonith architecture.
Some devices support a list of hosts which means you only need one
stonith resourc
actually after going through few previous posts i am kinda confused.
In > 2 nodes cluster , if we configure a ilo stonith (which can control
only one node at a time) for a particular node then
1) running it on only one node is enough.??
or
2) we should run it as clone on all nodes except f
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:23, Takenaka Kazuhiro
wrote:
> Hello
>
>> It is completely dependent on your stonith architecture.
>> Some devices support a list of hosts which means you only need one
>> stonith resource.
>
> Even if there is a such device, the Pacemaker stonith mechanism
> provides in
Hello
It is completely dependent on your stonith architecture.
Some devices support a list of hosts which means you only need one
stonith resource.
Even if there is a such device, the Pacemaker stonith mechanism
provides insufficient support for it. Suppose: how should its plugin
instance do w
2009/3/16 Romi Verma :
>>
>>
>> i guess if DC fails then CRM will elect any other node for DC role and
>> then , this new DC will try to fence the errant node , if it fails to fence
>> then it will choose other node for this fencing task.
>
> Andrew could you please confirm the above .
[insert s
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 19:21, Priyanka Ranjan wrote:
> Andrew : please correct me if i am wrong.
>>
>> This really make sense. but what if the DC itself fails and become
>> errant node then which node will be choosen to come forward and fence .
>
> i guess if DC fails then CRM will elect any o
>
>
>
> i guess if DC fails then CRM will elect any other node for DC role and then
> , this new DC will try to fence the errant node , if it fails to fence then
> it will choose other node for this fencing task.
>
Andrew could you please confirm the above .
one thing more related to stonith de
Andrew : please correct me if i am wrong.
>
>
>
> This really make sense. but what if the DC itself fails and become errant
> node then which node will be choosen to come forward and fence .
>
i guess if DC fails then CRM will elect any other node for DC role and then
, this new DC will try to
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 14:11, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:40:52AM +0530, Romi Verma wrote:
> >> Thanks Dejan,
> >> it is really good info for me . one more question, suppose we are
> running a
> >
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 14:11, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:40:52AM +0530, Romi Verma wrote:
>> Thanks Dejan,
>> it is really good info for me . one more question, suppose we are running a
>> stonith as clone on four nodes cluster. if one nodes fails and it needs t
even if all three nodes are trying to reset the errant node, dont you think
it would be better if a node would have informed other 2 members after
fencing the errant node that i have successfully stonith the errant node. it
will save other 2 nodes in putting extra effort in fencing the errant nod
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:09, Romi Verma wrote:
> Thanks for reply Dejan,
>>
>> No, there is no coordination between nodes. All of them will try
>> to reset the node.
>
> if All of them will try then dont you think it can lead to multiple reset?
> it's not good right??
Far better than corrupted
Thanks for reply Dejan,
>
>
> No, there is no coordination between nodes. All of them will try
> to reset the node.
>
if All of them will try then dont you think it can lead to multiple reset?
it's not good right??
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dejan
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Dejan
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:40:52AM +0530, Romi Verma wrote:
> Thanks Dejan,
> it is really good info for me . one more question, suppose we are running a
> stonith as clone on four nodes cluster. if one nodes fails and it needs to
> be fenced then who will be elected among rest three nodes to
Thanks Dejan,
it is really good info for me . one more question, suppose we are running a
stonith as clone on four nodes cluster. if one nodes fails and it needs to
be fenced then who will be elected among rest three nodes to fence this
errant node. how this election happens. is there any priority
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:07:18AM +0530, Romi Verma wrote:
> Dejan please reply , how do we set priority??
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:38, Romi Verma wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot Andrew for your reply,
> > > i have another quest
Dejan please reply , how do we set priority??
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:38, Romi Verma wrote:
> > Thanks a lot Andrew for your reply,
> > i have another question on stonith. i have configured sbd stonith and
> riloe
> > stonith. can i s
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:38, Romi Verma wrote:
> Thanks a lot Andrew for your reply,
> i have another question on stonith. i have configured sbd stonith and riloe
> stonith. can i set the order of execution. say i want riloe to get executed
> first and if it fails then sbd to get executed. shou
Thanks a lot Andrew for your reply,
i have another question on stonith. i have configured sbd stonith and riloe
stonith. can i set the order of execution. say i want riloe to get executed
first and if it fails then sbd to get executed. should i set priority??
it seems to me that suse 11 follows
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:13, Romi Verma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> do we have any way to encapsulate more than one resource into one . suppose
> i have a lvm resource, ip add resource so can i combine both? i know that
> we can set constraint to make them dependent on each other but do we have
> any
Hi All,
do we have any way to encapsulate more than one resource into one . suppose
i have a lvm resource, ip add resource so can i combine both? i know that
we can set constraint to make them dependent on each other but do we have
any other way.
second question i have , is there any way to kill
22 matches
Mail list logo
