Re: [Pacemaker] Understanding virtual IP migration

2014-08-04 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 07/30/2014 03:15 AM, Arjun Pandey wrote: Apologies for the delayed response. Well i am using IPAddr2 resource. I don't configure the addresses statically. It gets configured when pacemaker starts this resource.Failure handling of this link(when i manually bring the link down ) also works. It's

Re: [Pacemaker] Understanding virtual IP migration

2014-07-30 Thread Arjun Pandey
Apologies for the delayed response. Well i am using IPAddr2 resource. I don't configure the addresses statically. It gets configured when pacemaker starts this resource.Failure handling of this link(when i manually bring the link down ) also works. It's just that even though the IP has moved. If yo

Re: [Pacemaker] Understanding virtual IP migration

2014-07-23 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 07/23/2014 12:15 AM, Arjun Pandey wrote: I am using virtual IP resource on a 2 node (Active-Passive) cluster. I was testing the migration of IP address. Moving the link down moves the IP over to the other node. However if i bring interface up on the node the VIP is still associated with this

[Pacemaker] Understanding virtual IP migration

2014-07-22 Thread Arjun Pandey
Hi all I am using virtual IP resource on a 2 node (Active-Passive) cluster. I was testing the migration of IP address. Moving the link down moves the IP over to the other node. However if i bring interface up on the node the VIP is still associated with this interface. Shouldn't we have removed