Hi, Yan
Thank you for reply.
(2011/10/25 18:01), Gao,Yan wrote:
Hi Yuusuke,
On 10/20/11 20:43, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
Hi, Yan
(2011/09/26 17:46), Gao,Yan wrote:
A glance to the transition. After grpPostgreSQLDB3 was assigned to act1,
grpPostgreSQLDB1 was chosen to be processed, and it was assi
Hi Yuusuke,
On 10/20/11 20:43, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Yan
>
> (2011/09/26 17:46), Gao,Yan wrote:
>> A glance to the transition. After grpPostgreSQLDB3 was assigned to act1,
>> grpPostgreSQLDB1 was chosen to be processed, and it was assigned to act2
>> (because it had no preference between act2
Hi, Yan
(2011/09/26 17:46), Gao,Yan wrote:
A glance to the transition. After grpPostgreSQLDB3 was assigned to act1,
grpPostgreSQLDB1 was chosen to be processed, and it was assigned to act2
(because it had no preference between act2 and act3). And then
grpPostgreSQLDB2 went to act3.
Thank you fo
On 09/26/11 11:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> 2011/8/18 Yuusuke IIDA :
>> Hi, Yan
>> Hi, Andrew
>>
>> I started service by the following setting all at once.
>> However, the placement of the resource was not carried out as expected.
>>
>> * By a function of utilization, I confine the resource that can
2011/8/18 Yuusuke IIDA :
> Hi, Yan
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I started service by the following setting all at once.
> However, the placement of the resource was not carried out as expected.
>
> * By a function of utilization, I confine the resource that can start in each
> node to only one.
> * It is real