On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:26 PM, James Harper
james.har...@bendigoit.com.au wrote:
That thread goes around in circles and completely contradicts what
I'm
seeing. What I'm seeing is that unmanaged resources are never
monitored.
would be strange and how do you verify this? A look at your
Is pacemaker expected to monitor stopped and/or unmanaged resources? I'm
guessing not because that's what I've observed but I can't find the
behaviour documented anywhere so maybe there is a config option I can
tweak?
Thanks
James
___
Pacemaker
On 11/29/2011 11:30 AM, James Harper wrote:
Is pacemaker expected to monitor stopped and/or unmanaged resources? I'm
guessing not because that's what I've observed but I can't find the
behaviour documented anywhere so maybe there is a config option I can
tweak?
There was a thread on this
On 11/29/2011 11:30 AM, James Harper wrote:
Is pacemaker expected to monitor stopped and/or unmanaged resources?
I'm guessing not because that's what I've observed but I can't find
the behaviour documented anywhere so maybe there is a config option
I
can tweak?
There was a thread on
On 11/29/2011 11:37 PM, James Harper wrote:
On 11/29/2011 11:30 AM, James Harper wrote:
Is pacemaker expected to monitor stopped and/or unmanaged resources?
I'm guessing not because that's what I've observed but I can't find
the behaviour documented anywhere so maybe there is a config option
That thread goes around in circles and completely contradicts what
I'm
seeing. What I'm seeing is that unmanaged resources are never
monitored.
would be strange and how do you verify this? A look at your config may
also
help to shed some light on this ...
The relevant portions of the
