On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:33:54AM -0700, Patrick H. wrote:
>
>
> Sent: Wed Dec 15 2010 09:10:12 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
> From: Dejan Muhamedagic
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always)
> >H
Sent: Wed Dec 15 2010 09:10:12 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
From: Dejan Muhamedagic
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always)
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:08:52PM -0700, Patrick H. wrote:
Sent: Mon Dec 13 2010 15:19:48
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:08:52PM -0700, Patrick H. wrote:
> Sent: Mon Dec 13 2010 15:19:48 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
> From: Pavlos Parissis
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always)
> >If you pu
Sent: Mon Dec 13 2010 15:19:48 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
From: Pavlos Parissis
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always)
If you put all of them in a group and have the nfs_sdb1 as last
resource you will manage to have what
On 13 December 2010 06:09, Patrick H. wrote:
>
> So colocation is biting me in the ass again and I cant figure this one out.
> I have a group of iSCSI devices that then go into an md raid device that then
> goes into an lvm device which then gets mounted and then exported by nfs.
> Thoughout thi
So colocation is biting me in the ass again and I cant figure this one out.
I have a group of iSCSI devices that then go into an md raid device that
then goes into an lvm device which then gets mounted and then exported
by nfs. Thoughout this whole project I've had the resources trying to
start
